Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc., 581 N.W.2d 855.

185 citing documents.

In Re Daniel for the Establishment of Cartway 644 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Daniel for the Establishment of Cartway 644 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Lef-io v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc.
Wiegel v. City of St. Paul 639 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 2002
Wiegel v. City of St. Paul 639 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 2002
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enter., Inc.
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc., ().
Marshall County v. State 636 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marshall County v. State 636 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lefio v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc.
Brookdale Pontiac-GMC v. Federated Insurance 630 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Brookdale Pontiac-GMC v. Federated Insurance 630 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
D.M.S. v. Barber 627 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
D.M.S. v. Barber 627 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc.
Shaw Acquisition Co. v. Bank of Elk River 627 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Shaw Acquisition Co. v. Bank of Elk River 627 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc.
Weber v. Hvass 626 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Weber v. Hvass 626 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc., ().
Marriage of Krech v. Krech 624 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Krech v. Krech 624 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc., (applying principle of ejusdem generis, as codified in Minn.Stat.
Davies v. West Publishing Co. 622 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Davies v. West Publishing Co. 622 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc., (holding that this court reviews de novo the district court’s decision on summary judgment based on the application of a statute).
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc. ().
Skelly v. Mount 620 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Skelly v. Mount 620 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Respondent argues that since the CDA includes “readily ascertainable classes of individuals,” other “readily ascertainable classes” must be excluded from the term “other person.” But adopting this interpretation would run afoul of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s holding in Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.
Carlson v. Thompson 615 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Carlson v. Thompson 615 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc. (citation omitted).
K.R. v. Sanford 605 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2000
K.R. v. Sanford 605 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2000
The Committee cites our decision in Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc., and argues that the term “innocent third party” means an individual who did not contribute to the intoxication of the person who caused the injury.
Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 596 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 596 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.
Koehnen v. Dufuor 590 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1999
K.R. v. Sanford 588 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
K.R. v. Sanford 588 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc.