Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Woodruff v. State, 608 N.W.2d 881.
- State v. Lindsey 632 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2001
- State v. Lindsey 632 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2001
- State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
State v. Valentine
630 N.W.2d 429
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“[A] defendant may seek to introduce evidence that a third person * * * committed the crime of which defendant is accused.” (citation omitted).
- State v. Hooper 620 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000
- State v. Hooper 620 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000
- Gorman v. State 619 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Gorman v. State
619 N.W.2d 802
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
This court will not reverse a postconviction court’s decision “absent an abuse of discretion” and will “consider only whether sufficient evidence supports the postconviction court’s conclusions.” (citations omitted).