Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Smith, 619 N.W.2d 766.

85 citing documents.

Lana Dawn Hansch Barnes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A conviction based on circumstantial evidence warrants stricter scrutiny.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Claude Monroe Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Claude Monroe Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Actual possession requires “proof that [the defendant] physically had the [firearm] on his person.” d 766, 770 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Karau Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Karau Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A conviction based on circumstantial evidence warrants stricter scrutiny.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Dawayne Lester Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Dawayne Lester Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Hoshiar A. Sadiq Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Hoshiar A. Sadiq Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A conviction based on circumstantial evidence warrants stricter scrutiny.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Christopher Seals Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Christopher Seals Minn. Ct. App. 2016
13, 2000); (“[A] defendant may constructively possess a firearm if he placed the firearm where it was discovered.”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Perry Paczkowski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Perry Paczkowski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Brian Matthew Husnick Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brian Matthew Husnick Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A conviction based on circumstantial evidence warrants stricter scrutiny.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Corey Vern Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Patrick Ketz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Patrick Ketz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A conviction based on circumstantial evidence warrants stricter scrutiny.”2 review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Corey Vern Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Corey Stewart, Appellant.. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Corey Stewart, Appellant.. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[C]onstructive possession need not be exclusive, but may be shared.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A conviction based on circumstantial evidence warrants stricter scrutiny.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen Sam 859 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen Sam 859 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that to prove actual possession, the state would have needed to show “that appellant physically had the handgun on his person”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Kaupang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Kaupang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
see also Minn. Stat. §§ 152.025, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Mark William Cerney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mark William Cerney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Actual possession of a handgun requires proof that the defendant “physically had the handgun on his person.” d 766, 770 (2001), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“The evidence as [a] whole need not exclude all possibility that the defendant is innocent; it must only make such a theory seem unreasonable.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Ahmed 708 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Ahmed 708 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
review denied (Minn. Jan.