Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Navarre v. South Washington County Schools, 652 N.W.2d 9.

100 citing documents.

Patrick Exner v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James M. Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities Commission, and third party v. Hydrocon, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James M. Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities Commission, and third party v. Hydrocon, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Schs., (quotations omitted).
Erin Shegrud v. Garner Berry Eeg, Christa Blumer, State Farm Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jason Jalony Cox v. Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Erin Shegrud v. Garner Berry Eeg, Christa Blumer, State Farm Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sch., (quotation omitted).
Jason Jalony Cox v. Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Courts “must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and determine whether the verdict is manifestly against the entire evidence or whether despite the jury’s findings of fact the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services 862 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services 862 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Schs., n.5 (Minn. 2002).
Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association v. Star Tribune Media Company, LLC 862 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 2015
Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association v. Star Tribune Media Company, LLC 862 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 2015
Anthony Patrick Huber v. Jason R. Vohnoutka, Darlene Heimerl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Anthony Patrick Huber v. Jason R. Vohnoutka, Darlene Heimerl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
18 constant worry in addition to other symptoms.” Vohnoutka contends that Huber has submitted only “bare, conclusory allegations which are insufficient to create a fact issue concerning damages.” Huber’s who testified at trial that the defendant’s conduct had “made her extremely upset and caused her to be afraid to go out in public.” Id.
Gary Cyril Jenco v. Paul James Crowe, M.D., John Y. Hendricks, M.D., North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gary Cyril Jenco v. Paul James Crowe, M.D., John Y. Hendricks, M.D., North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
Madina Ula v. Bertil Eugene Gunnarson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sheryl v. Mooers v. City of Lake City, Minnesota, Karen England, individually Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Madina Ula v. Bertil Eugene Gunnarson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sch., (quotations omitted).
Sheryl v. Mooers v. City of Lake City, Minnesota, Karen England, individually Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 821 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 821 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 822 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 822 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Sch., (“[judicial restraint bids us to refrain from deciding any issue not essential to the disposition of the particular controversy before us.” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Welfare of R.S. 805 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 2011
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In Re Estate of Butler 782 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Estate of Butler 782 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
to be submitted to the jury”), *772 affd in part, rev’d in part, -30 (Minn.2002).
Longbehn v. Schoenrock 727 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Longbehn v. Schoenrock 727 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Courts “must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and determine whether the verdict is manifestly against the entire evidence or whether despite the jury’s findings of fact the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
An appellate court “will not set aside a jury verdict on an appeal from a district court’s denial of a motion for a new trial unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence viewed as a whole and in the light most favorable to the verdict.” (quotations omitted).
Rush v. Jostock 710 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rush v. Jostock 710 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
the verdict.’ ” (quotation omitted).
City of Duluth v. Duluth Police Local 690 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
City of Duluth v. Duluth Police Local 690 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Republican Party of Minnesota v. O'CONNOR 712 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 2004
Republican Party of Minnesota v. O'CONNOR 712 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 2004
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
County Schs., -32 (Minn.2002) (stating respondent’s claim for lost wages was not barred by her failure to pursue arbitration because she was not seeking to recover lost wages under her employment contract, but was seeking to recover lost wages for her alleged constructive discharge that resulted from alleged violations of the MG
Langeslag v. KYMN Inc. 664 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2003
Langeslag v. KYMN Inc. 664 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2003
In considering whether to grant a motion for JNOV, the district court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and considers “whether the verdict is manifestly against the entire evidence or whether despite the jury’s findings of fact the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. 663 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2003
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. 663 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2003
.1998) ("To establish a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must show that she was within a zone of danger of physical impact, reasonably feared for her safety, and suffered severe emotional distress with accompanying physical manifestations.”); see, aff'd in part, rev'd in part, and remanded
Star Tribune v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 659 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Star Tribune v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 659 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
§ 13.39, Minnesota courts have held that civil investigative data do not include: • a teacher’s personnel data, (holding that personnel data collected by a school district were not civil investigative data because “there was no evidence that * * * the data * * * [were] part of an active investigation undertaken for the purpose of commencing or defending a pending civil legal action.”); • a notice-of-claim letter

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by