Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ornelas, 675 N.W.2d 74.

69 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Will Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Darren Lee Whitelow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Darren Lee Whitelow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION “A district court has broad discretion in determining if there is sufficient evidence to revoke probation and should be reversed only if there is a clear abuse of that discretion.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones 857 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones 857 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
This is no less true whether the loss of liberty arises from a criminal conviction or the revocation of probation.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique Finch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique Finch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Otto Boyum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Otto Boyum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Alan Boos Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Alan Boos Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Any violation must relate to “a condition actually imposed by the [district] court.”
Pageau v. State 820 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Pageau v. State 820 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
This is no less true whether the loss of liberty arises from a criminal conviction or the revocation of probation.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
The principle that the state refers to prohibits a district court’s delegation of its authority to impose sentences — which includes imposition of terms and conditions of probation — because this is “exclusively a judicial function.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Johnson 743 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Johnson 743 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of R. V. 702 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Welfare of R. V. 702 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-80 (Minn.2004) (reversing revocation of adult probationer’s probation because condition alleged to have been violated was not imposed by district court); B.Y., d at 769 (stating that EJJ revocation must be based on condition found in disposition order).