Cited by

of Burke , ; see also Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2022).

An administrative agency’s decision enjoys a presumption of correctness, and we will only reverse an agency’s determination where the de termination violates the constitution, exceeds the agency’s authority or jurisdiction, is made under an unlawful procedure or other error of law, is not supported by substantial evidence, or is arbitrary and capricious, Minn.

1(a) (2020); see also In re Revocation of Family Child Care License of Burke , (recognizing that 11 The revocation order also stated that relators violated subpart 4(C) and (J) because foster father told county officials that he felt unsafe around the children and foster mother allegedly commented that it was “torture” to wait during the children’s three hour s of th

“Administrative-agency decisions enjoy a presumption of correctness and may be reversed only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency ’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.” In re Revocation of Family Child Care License of Burke , ; Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2020).

Discipline “must reflect the seriousness of [a] violation,” In re Revocation of Family Child Care License of Burke , and must also support the public interest in encouraging proper conduct of licensees , see Padilla, d at 887 (recognizing “harm to the public” if licensing violations are not punished).

Agency decisions “may be reversed only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.” In re Revocation of Family Child Care License of Burke , see also Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2018).

D E C I S I O N We presume that agency decisions are correct and will reverse only when they “are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.”

“In reviewing an agency’s decision on a legal issue, this court is not bound by the agency’s ruling.” d 724, 726 (Minn. App. 2003).

“In reviewing an agency ’s decision on a legal issue, this court is not bound by the agency’s ruling.” d 724, 726 (Minn. App. 2003).

C I S I O N “Administrative-agency decisions enjoy a presumption of correctness and may be reversed only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.”

E C I S I O N “Administrative-agency decisions enjoy a presumption of correctness and may be reversed only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.”

Administrative-agency decisions are presumed to be correct and “may be reversed only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.” Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2014).

DECISION “Administrative-agency decisions enjoy a presumption of correctness and may be reversed only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.” Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2014).

We presume that administrative-agency decisions are correct and reverse them “only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.” see also Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2014).

DECISION Administrative-agency decisions are presumed to be correct and “may be reversed only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.” see Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2014) (also providing for reversal or modification if decision is in violation of constitutional provisions).

DECISION Administrative-agency decisions are presumed to be correct and “may be reversed only when they are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the agency’s jurisdiction or statutory authority, are made upon unlawful procedure, reflect an error of law, or are unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record.” see also Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2014).

6 “[T]he severity of an administrative sanction must reflect the seriousness of the violation.”

of Comm’rs, (remanding for “a new EIS determination process in accordance with the standards set forth in this opinion”); (Minn.App.

b. Evidence “[T]he severity of an administrative sanction must reflect the seriousness of the violation.” (reversing revocation of daycare provider’s license as overly severe sanction); see also Haugen, d at 80-81 (affirming district court’s reversal of commissioner’s revocation of real estate brokers’ licenses as overly severe sanction); Henry Youth Hockey d at 457 (affirming revoca