Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against Weyhrich, 339 N.W.2d 274.

93 citing documents.

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Grzybek 567 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1997
Id,.; see also Jones, d at 306 (disbarring lawyer who showed demonstrated pattern of gross neglect); (disbarring lawyer who repeatedly neglected client matters, failed to communicate with clients over 4-year period, and failed to cooperate with board).
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Harp 560 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1997
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Harp 560 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1997
(disbarring attorney for misappropriation, failure to pay employee payroll taxes and failure to keep trust account records); (ordering disbarment for 18 counts of misconduct, including client neglect and noncommunication, misrepresentations, noncooperation, practicing without a license, misappropriation, and failure to pay personal debts); (disbarring attorney for repeated client neglect resulting in significant financial harm, noneooperation, and repeated violations of a probation stipulation o
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Cowan 540 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1995
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Cowan 540 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1995
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Shoemaker 518 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1994
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Shoemaker 518 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1994
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Olsen 487 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1992
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Olsen 487 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1992
In Re the Disciplinary Action Against Morin 469 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1991
In Re the Disciplinary Action Against Morin 469 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1991
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Walker 461 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Walker 461 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
In disbarment was appropriate for an attorney who repeatedly neglected client matters, failed to communicate with clients over a 4-year period, and failed to cooperate with the board.
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nora 450 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1990
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nora 450 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1990
Because one purpose of attorney discipline is to protect the public, an attorney’s remorse or lack of it is an important factor.
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Serstock 432 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1988
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Serstock 432 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1988
The referee found that respondent failed to establish any of the five factors required to prove mitigation as outlined in
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Flanery 431 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1988
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Flanery 431 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1988
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Munns 427 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1988
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Munns 427 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1988
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Schaefer 423 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1988
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Schaefer 423 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1988
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Pyles 421 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1988
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Pyles 421 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1988
One advancing such a claim has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence each of the five re *325 quirements outlined in
Matter of Discipline of Simonson 420 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1988
Matter of Discipline of Simonson 420 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1988
In Re the Disciplinary Action Against Jensen 418 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1988
In Re the Disciplinary Action Against Jensen 418 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1988
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Sampson 408 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1987
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Sampson 408 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1987
The purpose of attorney discipline is “to protect the public and the court and to serve as a deterrent against future misconduct.”
In Re the Discipline of Isaacs 406 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1987
In Re the Discipline of Isaacs 406 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1987
The purpose of attorney discipline “is to protect the public and the court and to serve as a deterrent against future misconduct.” In re Hanson, 258 Minn. 231, 233
Matter of Discipline of Schmidt 402 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Schmidt 402 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Shaw 396 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Shaw 396 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Carey 380 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Smith 381 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Smith 381 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1986
See, (attorney disbarred for continued neglect of client affairs); (indefinite suspension imposed upon attorney who neglected client affairs and failed to communicate with clients); In re Satterlee, 296 Minn. 515 , (indefinite suspension imposed upon
Matter of Discipline of Carey 380 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Kraemer 361 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1985
Matter of Discipline of Kraemer 361 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1985
Each case must be considered on its own facts and analyzed in *405 light of the purposes of an attorney disciplinary proceeding, which are “to protect the public and the court and to serve as a deterrent against future misconduct.”