Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, 342 N.W.2d 324.

97 citing documents.

In Re Occupational License of Hutchinson 440 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Reserve Mining, d at 824 ; see also Minnesota Power &amp
Rindahl v. St. Louis County Welfare Board 437 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Rindahl v. St. Louis County Welfare Board 437 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Minnesota Power & (citations omitted).
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
at 724 (quoting Minnesota Power & ).
M.T. Properties, Inc. v. Alexander 433 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
M.T. Properties, Inc. v. Alexander 433 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 425 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 425 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
L.K. v. Gregg 425 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1988
L.K. v. Gregg 425 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1988
Comm’n, Lange v. Nelson-Ryan Flight Serv., Inc., 263 Minn. 152, 155
Petition of Interstate Power Co. 419 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petition of Interstate Power Co. 419 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 417 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 417 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
As the supreme court stated in Minnesota Power & : The analytical approach to be used in calculating a return on common equity is a matter for the agency’s expertise.
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 416 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 416 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1987
As we noted in Minnesota Power & frequently it is difficult to review commission findings “under the traditional substantial evidence standard because it is not susceptible to precise verification on the evidentiary record due to its judgmental nature.” d at 330 .
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co. 413 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co. 413 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
County of Ramsey v. Neujahr 409 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
County of Ramsey v. Neujahr 409 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
1023 , 13 L.Ed.2d 962 (1965); Minnesota Power &amp
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Maddox v. Department of Human Services of Minnesota 400 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Maddox v. Department of Human Services of Minnesota 400 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader 394 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1986
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader 394 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1986
Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. Barris 384 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. Barris 384 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone 374 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone 374 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Minnesota Power & Light Co. *763 v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 376 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 376 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Brink's, Inc. v. Minnesota Transportation Regulation Board 373 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Brink's, Inc. v. Minnesota Transportation Regulation Board 373 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hough Transit, Ltd. v. Harig 373 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Herman v. Ramsey County Community Human Services Department 373 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hough Transit, Ltd. v. Harig 373 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Hartz’Estate, 238 Minn. 558, 559 , see also Minnesota Power &amp
Herman v. Ramsey County Community Human Services Department 373 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees 358 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1984
Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees 358 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1984
1018, 1026 , 16 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966); Minnesota Power & (“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion,” [Minn.1977]).
In Re Continental Telephone Co. of Minnesota, Inc. 358 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re Continental Telephone Co. of Minnesota, Inc. 358 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
ing the statutory standards is a presumption that agency decisions are correct, “out of deference to agency skill and technical expertise * * *.” (); see also Minnesota Power &amp
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Comm’n, Independent School Dist.
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen 347 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1984
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen 347 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1984
Recently, in Minnesota Power & this court discussed the "substantial evidence" standard.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by