DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Nurmi, 336 N.W.2d 65.

26 citing documents.

  • State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    The admission of photographs under these circumstances “is generally best left to the trial court.”
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Scheuble 392 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Scheuble 392 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    a. Manslaughter in the first-degree The trial court’s refusal to submit instructions on heat of passion manslaughter has been considered by the Minnesota Supreme Court recently in the following seven cases: and State v. Leinweber, 203 Minn. 414
  • State v. Koop 380 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Koop 380 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Gerring 378 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Gerring 378 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Sanders 376 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Sanders 376 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Galvan 374 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Galvan 374 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1985
    (state conceded that it was a lesser-included offense); State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414 , (making it clear that any lesser degrees of homicide should be submitted if the facts justify submission).
  • State v. Coleman 373 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Coleman 373 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Galvan 368 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Galvan 368 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Loftus v. State 357 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Loftus v. State 357 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Kinsky 348 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Kinsky 348 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1984
    The trial court is required to instruct the jury on a lesser offense “only if the offense is a so-called lesser-included offense and only if there is evidence which produces a rational basis for a verdict acquitting defendant of the offense charged and convicting him of the lesser offense.”
  • State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
    (i) Murder cases in which we have been asked to determine whether the trial court erred in refusing to submit first-degree heat-of-passion manslaughter include, in chronological order, State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414