Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Halper v. Halper, 348 N.W.2d 360.
- Murray v. Cisar 594 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Murray v. Cisar
594 N.W.2d 918
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Another definition of a retrospective law is one intended to affect transactions ivhich occurred, or rights tuhich accrued, before it became operative, and which ascribes to them effects not inherent in their nature, in view of the law in force at the time of their occurrence.” (quoting Cooper v. Watson, 290 Minn. 362, 369 , ).
- Marriage of Theroux v. Boehmler 410 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Theroux v. Boehmler 410 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Erickson v. Erickson 409 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Erickson v. Erickson
409 N.W.2d 898
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
17, 1986); (trial court correctly applied the child support guidelines because they became effective prior to issuance of the dissolution decree).
- Marriage of Heinlein v. Heinlein 407 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Heinlein v. Heinlein 407 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Rice v. Rice 393 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Rice v. Rice 393 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Moylan v. Moylan 384 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1986
-
Moylan v. Moylan
384 N.W.2d 859
Minn. 1986
However, and in subsequent cases, see, the addition of subdivision 5 to Minn. Stat. § 518.17 by chapter 308, § 17 of the 1983 Laws of Minnesota an
- Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Ozenna v. Parmelee 377 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Ozenna v. Parmelee 377 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 367 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 367 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Mathias v. Mathias 365 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Packer v. Holm 364 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Packer v. Holm 364 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Mathias v. Mathias 365 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Trebelhorn v. Uecker 362 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Trebelhorn v. Uecker 362 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Kusel v. Kusel 361 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Kusel v. Kusel
361 N.W.2d 165
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
which held that it is the date of the dissolution judgment and decree that determines the applicability of child support guidelines, governs here and that the guidelines are thus inapplicable.
- Lukanen v. Lukanen 357 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Hadrava v. Hadrava 357 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Lukanen v. Lukanen 357 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Hadrava v. Hadrava
357 N.W.2d 376
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
This court held, that the guidelines were applicable where, although not in effect at the time of the petition for dissolution, they had become effective before the court issued its judgment and decree.
- Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson 357 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson 357 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Mentzos v. Mentzos 353 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Mentzos v. Mentzos 353 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 352 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson
352 N.W.2d 819
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
at 363 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
- Marriage of Scott v. Scott 352 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Marriage of Scott v. Scott
352 N.W.2d 62
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
ANALYSIS Standard of review: this court stated: Trial courts are given broad discretion regarding child support matters.
- Bakke v. Bakke 351 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Bakke v. Bakke 351 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Shepard v. Shepard 352 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- VanderLeest v. VanderLeest 352 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Shepard v. Shepard
352 N.W.2d 42
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Minnesota Supreme Court has stated that “[wjhere the critical evidence is documentary, there is no need for us to defer to the trial court’s assessment of its meaning.” (citing In re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, 308 Minn. 221 , ); at 363 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
- VanderLeest v. VanderLeest 352 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1984