DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hanson, 366 N.W.2d 377.

38 citing documents.

  • State v. Newcombe 412 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Newcombe 412 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    which involved a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Harris 407 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Harris 407 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Gettel 404 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Gettel 404 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    This approach would have provided this court with “the facts concerning why defense counsel did or did not do certain things.”
  • State v. Franson 403 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Franson 403 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Lukens v. State 400 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Lukens v. State 400 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. McLAUGHLIN AND SCHULZ, INC. 397 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. McLAUGHLIN AND SCHULZ, INC. 397 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Ferraro, 277 Minn. 204, 208
  • State v. Erickson 396 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Erickson 396 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hart 393 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hart 393 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See e.g., State v. Feather, 288 Minn. 556
  • Garasha v. State 393 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Garasha v. State 393 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See, e.g., State v. Williams, 282 Minn. 240, 242
  • State v. Eberhardt 379 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Eberhardt 379 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    : The Minnesota Supreme Court has repeatedly said that an appeal from a judgment of conviction is not the most appropriate way of raising an issue concerning the effectiveness of the trial counsel’s representation because the reviewing court does not have the benefit of all the facts concerning
  • State v. Banks 379 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Banks 379 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Irwin 379 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Irwin 379 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Yant 376 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Yant 376 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    332 n. 5 (Minn.1984), a direct appeal is not the best way to challenge the effectiveness of counsel since no post-trial affidavits are available to explain why counsel selected to pursue his chosen course of conduct.
  • State v. Brown 376 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Brown 376 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Danielski 374 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Danielski 374 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Schaefer 374 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Schaefer 374 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See also State v. Hemstock, 276 Minn. 457 , (judgment affirmed on a direct appeal claiming that defendant pleaded guilty under a misapprehension of his legal rights, where defendant did not first ask the trial court to withdraw his plea); (affirming conviction directly appealed because the record was inadequate to review the claim that defendant was deprived of his sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel; issue more effectively presented in a post-conviction proceeding).
  • State v. Best 370 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Best 370 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Dorsch 368 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Dorsch 368 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Not only is a direct appeal an inappropriate way of raising this issue, *28 n. 5 (Minn.1984); the record shows that appellant received reasonably effective assistance of counsel.