Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co., 374 N.W.2d 187.

32 citing documents.

Steve Enestvedt, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
RSS Fridley, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co. , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Great Plains Educational Foundation, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co ., our court determined that “[a] ‘full integration’ clause does not prevent proof of fraudulent representations by a party to the contract.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Ola Abdelaziz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Barker v. County of Lyon 813 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Barker v. County of Lyon 813 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Co., (noting that, when an oral representation explicitly contradicts a written agreement, reliance on the oral representation is unjustifiable as a matter of law), review denied (Minn. Nov.
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co., review denied (Minn. Nov.
BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 779 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 779 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Olson 466 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Olson 466 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Fronning v. Blume 429 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Fronning v. Blume 429 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
St. Croix Printing Equipment, Inc. v. Rockwell International Corp. 428 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
St. Croix Printing Equipment, Inc. v. Rockwell International Corp. 428 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Veit v. Anderson 428 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Veit v. Anderson 428 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“Where there is an inconsistency between alleged oral promises and the written terms of an agreement, the issue is whether there could be reasonable reliance on the promise.” pet.
Riverbluff Development Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 412 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Riverbluff Development Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 412 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
1 pet for rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Sprangers v. Interactive Technologies, Inc. 394 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Sprangers v. Interactive Technologies, Inc. 394 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
( , 404 n. 4 (Minn.1980), pet.
Boyd v. DeGardner Realty & Construction 390 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Boyd v. DeGardner Realty & Construction 390 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilson's, Inc. v. Twin City Freight, Inc. 378 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Wilson's, Inc. v. Twin City Freight, Inc. 378 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-94 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) (setting out elements of fraudulent misrepresentation).