Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 374 N.W.2d 285.
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Nov.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Specific intent may be proven by circumstantial evidence, State v. Johnson , “by drawing inferences from the defe ndant’s words and actions in light of the totality of the circumstances.” State v. Smith , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
- State of Minnesota v. Randal Anthony Daher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Randal Anthony Daher
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1 (2014); (noting that fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle is a specific-intent crime), review denied (Minn. Nov.
- State v. Wilson 814 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. Wilson
814 N.W.2d 60
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(reversing denial of a motion for a new trial on the ground that it was error to omit an instruction on intent), review denied (Minn. Nov.
- Johnson v. Morris 453 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1990
- Johnson v. Morris 453 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1990
- State v. Obasi 427 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Obasi 427 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Clobes 417 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Clobes
417 N.W.2d 735
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Generally, the court has an obligation to clearly instruct the jurors on exactly what they must decide and should make “[s]ome minimal attempt to explain the elements of the offense * * *.” pet.
- State v. Witucki 420 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Witucki 420 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Marchand 410 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Marchand 410 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Oden 385 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Oden 385 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Erdman 383 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Erdman
383 N.W.2d 331
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
we have not been cited to any case in which failure to give a specific intent instruction constituted “fundamental error.” In Johnson , which was also a prosecution for fleeing or eluding a police officer under § 609.487, we held that under the peculiar facts of the case, failure to instruct the ju