Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Anderson, 379 N.W.2d 70.

126 citing documents.

State v. Horoshak 415 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Horoshak 415 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Smeriglio 409 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Smeriglio 409 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Roehl 409 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Roehl 409 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
cert denied, 475 U.S.-, 106 S.Ct.
State v. Anderson 405 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Anderson 405 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Doughman 404 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Doughman 404 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Berg v. State 403 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Berg v. State 403 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finally, we note that the polygraph examination report submitted by Berg was not part of the record, is generally inadmissible, cert.
State v. Eli 402 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Eli 402 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sanders v. State 400 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sanders v. State 400 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Berndt 392 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
State v. Berndt 392 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
West v. State 390 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
West v. State 390 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ANALYSIS I. The jury resolves conflicts in testimony because it has “the opportunity to observe the demeanor of witnesses and to weigh their credibility.” cert.
State v. Nordstrum 385 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Nordstrum 385 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Race 383 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1986
State v. Race 383 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1986