Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Katz v. Katz, 408 N.W.2d 835.

88 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that a 7 We next turn to appellant’s motion to modify parenting time, which is ordinarily analyzed under Minn. Stat. § 518.175, subd.
In Re the ESTATE OF Esther Caroline SULLIVAN, Decedent 868 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the ESTATE OF Esther Caroline SULLIVAN, Decedent 868 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“[W]e will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is based on incorrect reasons.”).
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“[W]e will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is based on incorrect reasons.”).
Carroll A. Britton v. Harry Hohman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Carroll A. Britton v. Harry Hohman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
P. 61 (providing that harmless error is to be disregarded); (“[Appellate courts] will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is based on incorrect reasons.”).
Lucas Gordon Bunde v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lucas Gordon Bunde v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“[W]e will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is based on incorrect reasons.”).
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Christopher Roehl Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Christopher Roehl Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The district court did not have the benefit of the Brooks decision when it ruled that “McNeely is limited to cases involving warrantless nonconsensual blood draws for the purposes of [alcohol-concentration] testing.” But “we will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is based on incorrect reasons.”
Scott Marshall Karo v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Scott Marshall Karo v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P. 836 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P. 836 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
But “we will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is based on incorrect reasons.”
State v. Reinke 702 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Reinke 702 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating that appellate courts will not reverse decisions below simply because they are based on incorrect reasoning).
State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(“[W]e will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is based on incorrect reasons.”).
State v. Miller 689 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Miller 689 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(stating that this court will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is based on incorrect reasoning).
Blackwell v. 2002 KIA 4 DOOR STL SEDAN 670 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Blackwell v. 2002 KIA 4 DOOR STL SEDAN 670 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Wolf Motor Co. v. One 2000 Ford F-350, , 903 n. 3 (Minn.App.2003)
Wolf Motor Co. v. One 2000 Ford F-350, VIN IFTSX31F1YEC59488 658 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Wolf Motor Co. v. One 2000 Ford F-350, VIN IFTSX31F1YEC59488 658 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(a correct decision will not be reversed because it is based on incorrect reasons).
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
C.J. Duffey Paper Co. v. Reger 588 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
C.J. Duffey Paper Co. v. Reger 588 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity 511 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity 511 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of Bartl v. Bartl 497 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Bartl v. Bartl 497 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(trial court will not be reversed where it reaches right result for wrong reason).
Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke 428 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke 428 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Driscoll v. Driscoll 414 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Driscoll v. Driscoll 414 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
3160 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1180 (1976) ()