Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Scruggs, 421 N.W.2d 707.

115 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
-67 (Minn.1989) (dictum).
State v. Montanaro 463 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1990
State v. Montanaro 463 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1990
We have also said that pretrial review of a motion to dismiss is discretionary and is reserved for “extraordinary circumstances.”
State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
quoted in Johnson, d at 466-67 (emphasis supplied by the supreme court).
State v. Mosby 450 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Mosby 450 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Johnson 441 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1989
State v. Shoop 441 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1989
State v. Johnson 441 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1989
The defendants also petitioned this court for discretionary review and filed a
State v. Shoop 441 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1989
Among our recent decisions dealing with the sufficiency of the evidence of corroboration, -14 (Minn.1988).
State v. Moore 438 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1989
State v. Moore 438 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1989