Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. Asper, 428 N.W.2d 47.

44 citing documents.

Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Real Estate License of Mark Dziuk, License No. 40213396. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Real Estate License of Mark Dziuk, License No. 40213396. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Duty Disability Benefits for Matthew Olson. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Duty Disability Benefits for Matthew Olson. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
George A. Hormel & contra J.C.
GH Holdings, LLC v. Minnesota Department of Commerce 840 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
GH Holdings, LLC v. Minnesota Department of Commerce 840 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
A. Hormel & in which the supreme court stated that the “agency’s interpretation of the statutes it administers is entitled to deference and should be upheld, absent a finding that it is in conflict with the express purpose of the act and the intention of the legislature.” But an agency’s “suggestion of deference
Schwanke v. Minnesota Department of Administration 834 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schwanke v. Minnesota Department of Administration 834 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
4, is entitled to deference, citing George A. Hormel &amp
In the Matter of Administrative Order Issued to Wright Cnty. 784 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In the Matter of Administrative Order Issued to Wright Cnty. 784 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Hubbard 778 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2010
In Re Hubbard 778 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2010
A. Hormel & but in that case, we did not have to address the question of whether the legislature had given the agency the authority to take the action (decision on a claim for unemployment compensation benefits) at issue in the case.
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
2778, 2780-82 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984) (federal agency interpretation of federal statute); George A. Hormel & (state agency interpretation of a state statute); -25 (Minn.1977) (same).
In Re American Iron and Supply Co. 604 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Minneapolis v. State 604 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Minneapolis v. State 604 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
A. Hormel & We have held that when an agency reason *145 ably interprets a statute, it is the role of the legislature or the supreme court, and not the role of this court, to overrule that interpretation.
In Re American Iron and Supply Co. 604 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Benda v. Girard 592 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 1999
Benda v. Girard 592 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 1999
Benda v. Girard 585 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Benda v. Girard 585 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the Quantification of Environmental Costs 578 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the Quantification of Environmental Costs 578 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
A. Hormel & (stating courts uphold agency’s interpretation of statutes that agency administers unless interpretation conflicts with statute’s purpose and legislative intent).
Matter of University of Minnesota 566 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of University of Minnesota 566 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Nerby v. Talent Partners 518 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Nerby v. Talent Partners 518 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re Henry Youth Hockey Ass'n, License No. 02795 511 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re Henry Youth Hockey Ass'n, License No. 02795 511 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Parnell v. River Bend Carriers, Inc. 484 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Parnell v. River Bend Carriers, Inc. 484 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co. 478 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co. 478 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
A. Hormel & (citations omitted).
Lemmerman v. ETA Systems, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Lemmerman v. ETA Systems, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
A. Hormel & (cita *434 tions omitted); see Minn.Stat.
In Re the Proposed Suspension, Revocation or Non-Renewal of the Nursing Home Licenses of Parkway Manor Healthcare Center 448 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Proposed Suspension, Revocation or Non-Renewal of the Nursing Home Licenses of Parkway Manor Healthcare Center 448 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1989