Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Folley, 438 N.W.2d 372.

63 citing documents.

State v. Zeimet 696 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 2005
See, (stating that jail credit should not turn on matters that are subject to manipulation such as the timing of the filing of a criminal complaint); (approving a method for sentencing multiple current convictions under circumstances of the case which sho
State v. Jackson 557 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1996
State v. Jackson 557 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1996
See, -75 (Minn.1989), (held, for various reasons, defendant was entitled to jail credit against his sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct from time of his arrest on driving-related charge, rather than from later date on which he was arrested and formally charged with sex crimes).
State v. Morales 532 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Morales 532 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The calculation of jail credit “should not turn on matters that are subject to manipulation by the prosecutor.”
State v. Fritzke 521 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Fritzke 521 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Clark 486 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Clark 486 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Weber 470 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1991
State v. Weber 470 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1991
-75 (Minn.1989), quoted with approval in Goar, d at 29 -30: In the last several years, we have issued a number of decisions in different contexts clarifying when a defendant is entitled to jail credit.
State v. Goar 453 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1990
State v. Goar 453 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1990