Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., 448 N.W.2d 865.

42 citing documents.

Lisa Thielen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Appellants cite Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., to support their argument that actual notice suffices.
Amaal Mohammed Shire v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, Lester L. Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Amaal Mohammed Shire v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, Lester L. Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
which did not necessitate service on the substitute party.” Buysse v. Baumann-Furre & Co.
Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & Pines 768 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & Pines 768 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See, e.g., Buysse v. Baumannr-Furrie & Co., -69 (Minn.1989); Buckentin, d at 823, 825 .
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Newmech Companies 678 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Newmech Companies 678 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
But when an insurance company completely denies coverage, the insured may independently enter into a settlement agreement in order to “extricate himself or herself.” Buysse et al. v. Bawmann-Furrie & Co.
Peterson v. Wilson Township 672 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 2003
Peterson v. Wilson Township 672 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 2003
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 662 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 2003
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 662 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 2003
.See, e.g., Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., (citing Rule 1.7, on direct disqualification of a single firm handling adverse parties in separate matters); Buckentin, d at 823 (citing Rule 1.9 on direct disqualification); Faegre & Benson, No. C0-00-2075, 2001 WL 605088 at *3 (Minn.App.
Nordstrom v. Eaton 652 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Nordstrom v. Eaton 652 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
“The purpose of garnishment is to reach property in the hands of the garnishee in order to apply it in satisfaction of the judgment.”
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District 11 638 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District 11 638 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See, e.g., Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., -69 (Minn.1989) (stating that Jenson provided a well-defined approach to the question of disqualification); Prod.
Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Gavenda 590 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1999
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Sargent v. Johnson, 551 F.2d 221, 232 (8th Cir.1977) (plaintiff and insured entered into “a questionable collaboration by which the parties maneuvered through terms of a settlement agreement to impose an uncompromised full balance of a judgment upon the insurer, while the insured incurred no real detriment”), quoted in Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., , 874 n. 8 (Minn.1989).
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 505 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1993
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 505 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1993
Buysse v. Bau-mann-Furrie & Co., citing Sargent v. Johnson, 551 F.2d 221, 230 (8th Cir.1977).
B & B Floor Covering Co. v. Country View Builders, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
B & B Floor Covering Co. v. Country View Builders, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., (citations omitted).
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 498 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 498 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
This litigation arises out of an accounting malpractice lawsuit and has been the subject of two decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court, Buysse v. Baumann-Fur-rie & Co., (.Buysse I) and Buysse v. Baumann-Fur-rie & Co., (Buysse II).
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., (emphasis in original).
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 481 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1992
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 481 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1992
Paul F. & M.’s favor after a remand from this court in Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., (.Buysse I).
Carlson v. Hennepin County 479 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1992
Carlson v. Hennepin County 479 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1992
See Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., cited in Soo Line.
Carlson v. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. 475 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Carlson v. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. 475 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., -69 (Minn.1989); Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co., -33 (Minn.1983)
Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad 463 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1990
Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad 463 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1990
Buysse v. Bau-mann-Furrie & Co.
S.G. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 460 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
S.G. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 460 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
at 230 ; Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., -74 (Minn.1989); pet.
Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad 454 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad 454 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
at 2384 ; Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.
Ebenezer Society v. Dryvit Systems, Inc. 453 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Ebenezer Society v. Dryvit Systems, Inc. 453 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.