Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Schmidt, 443 N.W.2d 824.

115 citing documents.

State v. Eller 780 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(holding that if an appellate court cannot grant effectual relief, the issue is deemed moot).
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 768 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 2009
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 768 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 2009
"As a constitutional prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction, we must consider the mootness question even if ignored by the parties.”
Enright v. Lehmann 735 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 2007
Enright v. Lehmann 735 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 2007
Peterson v. Johnson 733 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Peterson v. Johnson 733 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(explaining that appellate court will only decide actual controversies and will not issue advisory opinions); (stating that court may not exercise authority over nonparty).
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(linking standing to availability of relief); (noting that case is moot if courts cannot “grant effectual relief’); see also Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 217 , 82 S.Ct.
Amundson v. State 714 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Amundson v. State 714 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Civil Commitment of Raboin 704 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Civil Commitment of Raboin 704 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan 687 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan 687 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Appointment of a Trustee for the Heirs of Bodeker 661 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Appointment of a Trustee for the Heirs of Bodeker 661 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“If the court is unable to grant effectual relief, the issue raised is deemed to be moot resulting in dismissal of the appeal.” (citation omitted).
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety 642 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 2002
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 641 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2002
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 641 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2002
Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety 642 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 2002
Chaney v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 641 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Chaney v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 641 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Schiff v. Griffin 639 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Schiff v. Griffin 639 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Soo Line Railroad v. City of Minneapolis 625 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Soo Line Railroad v. City of Minneapolis 625 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“[T]he court does not issue advisory opinions, nor decide cases merely to establish precedent.” (citation omitted).
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(when an event occurs that makes decision unnecessary, the case should be dismissed as moot); (same).
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Brooks 604 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 2000
State v. Brooks 604 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 2000
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc. 606 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc. 606 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re McCaskill 603 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1999
In Re McCaskill 603 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1999
State v. Arens 586 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1998
State v. Arens 586 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1998
We do “not issue advisory opinions, nor decide cases merely to establish precedent.”
Minnesota Community College Faculty Ass'n v. State 562 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnesota Community College Faculty Ass'n v. State 562 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
ANALYSIS I. “If the court is unable to grant effectual relief, the issue raised is deemed to be moot resulting in dismissal of the appeal.” (citation omitted).
In Re Conservatorship of Foster 547 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1996
In Re Conservatorship of Foster 547 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1996
A statute bears the presumption of validity, and the “party challenging the constitutionality of the statute has the onus of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute violates a claimed right.”
In Re Public Conservatorship of Foster 535 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1995

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by