Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hannuksela, 452 N.W.2d 668.

308 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
Similarly, which presented a marital privilege scope issue rather than waiver issue, this court expressed an aversion to “erecting artificial ‘barriers to the ascertainment of truth.’ ” Id.
Greenbush State Bank v. Stephens 463 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Greenbush State Bank v. Stephens 463 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
State v. Glidden 455 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1990
State v. Glidden 455 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1990
Recently, , 673-74 n. 7 (Minn.1990), we said that it is proper foV an appellate court to decide an issue not raised on appeal only when the reasoning relied upon by the appellate court is neither novel nor questionable.