Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gray, 456 N.W.2d 251.

97 citing documents.

State v. Enyeart 676 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Smith 674 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2004
State v. Smith 674 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2004
State v. DeYoung 672 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. DeYoung 672 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kycia 665 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kycia 665 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of B.R.K. 658 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2003
In Re the Welfare of B.R.K. 658 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2003
State v. Smith 655 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Houston 654 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Smith 655 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Houston 654 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Coonrod 652 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Coonrod 652 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Landa 642 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2002
State v. Landa 642 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2002
-60 (Minn.1990) (explaining that the jury is not obligated to believe the defendant’s story; rather, the court assumes that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and no contrary evidence).
State v. Compassionate Home Care, Inc. 639 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Compassionate Home Care, Inc. 639 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Victorsen 627 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Victorsen 627 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(noting the district court’s discretion in selecting jury instructions) ().
State v. Miranda 622 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Miranda 622 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(citing Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294, 299-300 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sanderson v. State 601 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sanderson v. State 601 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Traxler 583 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1998
State v. Traxler 583 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1998
State v. Perkins 582 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1998
State v. Perkins 582 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1998
State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
Trial courts have “considerable latitude in the selection of the language of the jury charge.”
State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
(second-degree intentional murder); Persitz, d at 848-49 (premeditated murder); -59 (Minn.1990) (premeditated murder and felony murder), cert.
State v. Green 538 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Green 538 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Waste Recovery Cooperative of Minnesota v. County of Hennepin 504 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Waste Recovery Cooperative of Minnesota v. County of Hennepin 504 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
507, 516 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring); cert.
State v. Day 501 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Day 501 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the Welfare of D.A.G. 484 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1992
In Re the Welfare of D.A.G. 484 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1992
reh’g denied (Minn., July 9, 1990), cert.
State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
State v. Garrett 479 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Garrett 479 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1992