In Re Disciplinary Action James H. O'Hagan
Cited by
- Tina Marie Lund, as conservator of the Honorable Fred Karasov v. Calhoun Orange, Inc. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Brothers Fire Protection Co., d/b/a Brothers Fire and Security, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- In the Matter of the Expulsion of A.D. From United South Central Public Schools … 883 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 2016
- Rene Julian McKenzie v. State of Minnesota 872 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill 871 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2015
- Lyon Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group with its principal … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Patrick Exner, Relator v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 849 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13 842 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Doran v. Independent School District No. 720 831 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- Woodhall v. State 738 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2007
- Mahoney & Hagberg v. Newgard 712 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Shaner v. Independent School District No. 2884 604 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 450 N.W.2d 571
Opinion text
ORDER The Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility on December 5, 1989, filed a petition with this court in which the Director alleged that the respondent had misappropriated approximately $3,000,000 from his law firm’s trust fund accounts and had committed frauds against a client by requesting funds in a certain amount while actually settling for much lower amounts, retaining the difference for. his personal use. By court order dated December 5, 1989, this court temporarily suspended the respondent from the practice of law pending final determination of the disciplinary proceedings. More than 20 days have elapsed since service of the Director’s petition upon the respondent. The respondent has failed to serve or file his answer to the petition as required by Minnesota Rules of Lawyers Professional Responsibility 13(a). Accordingly, the allegations contained in the Director’s petition are deemed admitted. Minn.R.Law.Prof.Resp. 13(b). Additionally, respondent, by letter to the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility dated December 21, 1989, and received by that office on December 26, stated he did not intend to file an Answer to the Petition and he agreed to disbarment. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 15, Minn.R.Law.Prof.Resp., IT IS ORDERED that respondent James H. O'Ha-gan is hereby disbarred from the practice of law effective immediately.