DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Farm Insurance Companies v. Seefeld, 481 N.W.2d 62.

109 citing documents.

USCC Services, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, judgment creditor, Respondent/Co-Appellant v. Justin Beauchane, Judgment Debtor, and North Star Mutual … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, judgment creditor, Respondent/Co-Appellant v. Justin Beauchane, Judgment Debtor, and North Star Mutual … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 825 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2013
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 825 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2013
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Newmech Companies 678 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Newmech Companies 678 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek 669 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2003
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek 669 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2003
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schmitt 651 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schmitt 651 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Buller v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual 648 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Buller v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual 648 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 644 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 644 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Dohney v. Allstate Insurance Co. 632 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2001
Dohney v. Allstate Insurance Co. 632 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2001
Health Personnel v. Peterson 629 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Health Personnel v. Peterson 629 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Brookdale Pontiac-GMC v. Federated Insurance 630 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Brookdale Pontiac-GMC v. Federated Insurance 630 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 625 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 625 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Thommes v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 622 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Thommes v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 622 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Newberg v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 619 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Newberg v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 619 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Duffy 618 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Duffy 618 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 617 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 617 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Rewitzer 617 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 2000
State v. Rewitzer 617 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 2000
Zurich Reinsurance (UK) Ltd. v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 613 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Zurich Reinsurance (UK) Ltd. v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 613 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(“Insurance coverage issues are questions of law for the court.”).
Zimmerman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 605 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2000
Zimmerman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 605 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2000
(stating that insurance coverage issues are questions of law).
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Wilson Township 603 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Wilson Township 603 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(holding ambiguous exclusion must be construed in insured’s favor); see also 13 John Alan Appleman & Jean Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice § 7403, at 324 (1976) (construing words of exception against insurer).
Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 596 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 596 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Pergament v. Loring Properties, Ltd. 599 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1999