Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka, 474 N.W.2d 324.

34 citing documents.

James Thomas Miller, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wicka, (citing section 895J, comment c, as authority for reasoning that “it is axiomatic” that a mentally ill insured may be held liable for an intentional tort if they “have been able to entertain the proscribed intent to cause bodily injury and .
Western National Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
an intentional act exclusion applies only where the insured acts with the specific intent to cause bodily injury.”
Deangelo Profit, Minn. 2023
In Re: Henry Hickman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
North Star Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co. v. Wicka , (emphasis added).
Christine Dittel v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Christine Dittel v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Minn. Ct. App. 2015
RAM Mutual Insurance Company v. EMC Property & Casualty Company, John Shriver as Trustee for the Next of … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
RAM Mutual Insurance Company v. EMC Property & Casualty Company, John Shriver as Trustee for the Next of … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Netland 762 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 2009
State v. Netland 762 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 2009
but that case was not about due pro *208 cess.
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Schwich 749 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Schwich 749 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Netland 742 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Netland 742 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
see also Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)
B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
us the following certified question: Where insurance coverage is being or has been sought for personal injury or bodily harm resulting from an insured’s nonconsensual sexual contact with another, can the trial court submit to a jury the question of whether the insured’s acts were “unintentional” because of mental illness as set forth in the holding of State Farm Fire & and therefore outside the scope of an insurance policy’s intentional act exclusion, or must the court infer the insured’s in
American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser 628 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2001
State v. Wolf 605 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 2000
State v. Wolf 605 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 2000
German Mutual Insuurance Co. v. Yeager 554 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
German Mutual Insuurance Co. v. Yeager 554 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
v. Wicka, Woida v. North Star Mut.
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State Farm Fire & (citations omitted).
Rw v. Tf 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
R.W. v. T.F. 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
Rw v. Tf 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
State Farm Fire & Woida v. North Star Mutual Ins.
R.W. v. T.F. 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
State Farm Fire & Woida v. North Star Mutual Ins.
Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & Hannan 494 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1992
Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & Hannan 494 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1992
American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Cordie 478 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Cordie 478 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
It reasoned no genuine issues of material fact were presented that at the time Cordie killed Silberstein, Cordie was unable to control his conduct “in accordance with reason because of his mental illness.” See State Farm Fire & aff'd as modified
Silberstein v. Cordie 477 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1991
Silberstein v. Cordie 477 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1991
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Randy Cordie for further review be, and the same is