Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. v. American Appraisal Associates, Inc., 469 N.W.2d 88.

25 citing documents.

Bay & Bay Transfer Co. Inc., d/b/a Bay @ Bay Transportation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appraisal Assocs., Inc., -90 (Minn. 1991).
Medtronic, Inc. v. Matthew Lahn, AlphaTec Spine, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Medtronic, Inc. v. Matthew Lahn, AlphaTec Spine, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. v. American Appraisal Assocs., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison v. American Petroleum Institute, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison v. American Petroleum Institute, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appraisal Assocs., Inc., -90 (Minn. 1991).
Tanner Lynn, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
tion under section 303.06 did not violate the dormant Commerce Clause, emphasizing that, in addition to having a registered agent, “BNSF owns 1,469 miles of railroad track and employs approximately 1,800 people in Minnesota.” In resolving both arguments, the district court relied on precedent from the Minnesota Supreme Court: Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. v. American 4 Appraisal Associates, Inc., (Due Process Clause); Erving v. Chicago & N orthwestern Railway Co., 214 N.W.
A24-1652 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appraisal Assocs., Inc., d 88, 89, 91 (Minn. 1991), and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., 538–39 (Minn. App. 2009), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Fair Isaac Corporation v. Michael Gordon, Callcredit Information Group Limited Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Fair Isaac Corporation v. Michael Gordon, Callcredit Information Group Limited Minn. Ct. App. 2016
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc. 772 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc. 772 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Paulownia Plantations De Panama Corp. v. Rajamannan 757 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Paulownia Plantations De Panama Corp. v. Rajamannan 757 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Danielson v. National Supply Co. 670 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Danielson v. National Supply Co. 670 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Gavle v. Little Six, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1996
Gavle v. Little Six, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1996
167 (1939)); Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. v. American Appraisal Associates, Inc.
Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 555 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 555 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Forum Non Conveniens Dismissal on the basis of the doctrine of forum non conveniens may be appropriate where the exercise of personal jurisdiction “imposes a hardship that does not rise to the level of a due process violation.” Rykoff-Sexton
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. 543 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. 543 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Rykoff-Sexton, (applying the statute as a means of gaining personal jurisdiction); State ex rel.
Gavle v. Little Six, Inc. 534 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gavle v. Little Six, Inc. 534 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
1 (1992); Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. v. American Appraisal Assoc., Inc.
Valspar Corp. v. Lukken Color Corp. 495 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1992
Valspar Corp. v. Lukken Color Corp. 495 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1992
Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. *411 v. American Appraisal Assocs., (rev’d on other grounds ); -28 (Minn.App.1986) pet for rev. denied, (Minn. Aug.