Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Williams, 525 N.W.2d 538.
- State v. Carter 545 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
State v. Carter
545 N.W.2d 695
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
We recognize “the growing body of evidence relating to ‘[t]he disparity of sentencing between people of color and whites.’ ”
- State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
-
State v. Smith
541 N.W.2d 584
Minn. 1996
t a departure “[w]hen the offender is convicted of multiple current felony convictions for crimes against different persons, and when the sentence for the most severe current conviction is executed according to the guidelines.” Finally, Smith argues that because he is of African-American heritage
- State v. Cogshell 538 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1995
- State v. Cogshell 538 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1995
- State v. Gaitan 536 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1995
- State v. Gaitan 536 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1995
- State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
- State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
- State v. McKenzie 532 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1995
-
State v. McKenzie
532 N.W.2d 210
Minn. 1995
which arose under both the federal and the state constitutions.
- State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
- State v. Bowles 530 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1995
- In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 528 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1995