Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Neitzel v. County of Redwood, 521 N.W.2d 73.

36 citing documents.

In re the Matter of Joseph Rued, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
6 (Minn. 2017); rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Steven W. Trisco, et al., Appellants, vs. County of Douglas, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Minn. Stat. § 606.01 (2020) (providing that petitions for writ of certiorari must be filed in court of appeals); -76 (Minn. App. 1994) (holding that, in absence of statute 4 authorizing judicial review, applicant challenging denial of CUP for feedlot may obtain judicial review by writ of certiorari in court of appeals), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Lenny N. Anderson v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lenny N. Anderson v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at *2 ( review denied (Minn. Oct.
Centra Homes, LLC v. City of Norwood Young America 834 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Centra Homes, LLC v. City of Norwood Young America 834 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
of Redwood, (stating that county board was not acting pursuant to section 462.361 when it denied conditional-use permit because conditional-use permits are governed by section 394.301), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Veit Co. v. Lake County 707 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Veit Co. v. Lake County 707 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
revieiv denied (Minn. Oct.
Carlson v. Chermak 639 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Carlson v. Chermak 639 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
United Migrant Opportunity Services, Inc. v. Dodge County Planning Commission 636 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
United Migrant Opportunity Services, Inc. v. Dodge County Planning Commission 636 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Sunrise Lake Ass'n v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 633 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Sunrise Lake Ass'n v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 633 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
revieiu denied (Minn. Oct.
Maye v. University of Minnesota 615 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Maye v. University of Minnesota 615 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(citing Plunkett v. First Nat’l Bank, 262 Minn. 231, 245-46 , ), review denied (Minn. Oct.
City of Victoria v. County of Carver 567 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
City of Victoria v. County of Carver 567 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(holding that writ of certiorari issued by court of appeals is the only available method for applicant to obtain judicial review of county board’s denial of conditional use permit), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Molnar v. County of Carver Board of Commissioners 568 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Molnar v. County of Carver Board of Commissioners 568 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Press v. City of Minneapolis 553 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Press v. City of Minneapolis 553 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Paul City Council, (city council’s denial of liquor license application); -76 (Minn. App.1994) (county board’s denial of application for conditional use permit for hog feedlot), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 551 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 551 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
76 n. 1 (Minn.App.1994) (stating, “Although judicial review * * ⅜ has been obtained by bringing an action in the district court, the issue of the proper method to obtain review was not raised in those cases”), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Toby's of Alexandria, Inc. v. County of Douglas 545 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Toby's of Alexandria, Inc. v. County of Douglas 545 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(holding that writ of certiorari is appropriate mechanism for review of a county board’s denial of a conditional use permit), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Shetka v. Aitkin County 541 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Shetka v. Aitkin County 541 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 538 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 538 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Application of Merritt 537 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Application of Merritt 537 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Relator contends, however, review denied (Minn. Oct.
Micius v. St. Paul City Council 524 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Pierce v. Otter Tail County 524 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Pierce v. Otter Tail County 524 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Micius v. St. Paul City Council 524 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Neitzel v. *523 County of Redwood, -76 (Minn.App.1994), pet.