Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lolling v. Midwest Patrol, 545 N.W.2d 372.

67 citing documents.

Tyler Leibfried, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
() (other citation omitted).
Asha Ahmed, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The party seeking review on appeal has the burden of proving that the agency has exceeded its statutory authority.” In re Class A License Application of N. Metro Harness, Inc., (), rev. denied (Minn. June 20, 2006).
Fatoumata Kaba, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Diane Quick, Relator v. Polar Semiconductor, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Diane Quick, Relator v. Polar Semiconductor, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“While this court is not bound by an agency’s conclusions of law, the manner in which an agency has construed a statute may be entitled to some weight when the statutory language is technical in nature and the agency’s interpretation is one of longstanding application.”
Lennis Bentrud, Relator v. Robin Drug Corp., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lennis Bentrud, Relator v. Robin Drug Corp., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We view the factual findings in the light most favorable to the ULJ’s decision, and give deference to the ULJ’s credibility determinations, Jenson v. Dep’t of Econ.
Schwanke v. Minnesota Department of Administration 834 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schwanke v. Minnesota Department of Administration 834 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
While we are not bound by the department of administration’s legal conclusions, “the manner in which an agency has construed a statute may be entitled to some weight when the statutory language is technical in nature and the agency’s interpretation is one of longstanding application.”
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Roth v. Commissioner of Corrections 759 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Roth v. Commissioner of Corrections 759 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
A party seeking appellate review of an agency decision “has the burden of proving that the agency has exceeded its statutory authority or jurisdiction.”
In Re the Disability Earnings Offset of Masson 753 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Disability Earnings Offset of Masson 753 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(relying on section 645.17(5) in holding that public interest favored statutory interpretation permitting Department of Economic Security to consider employer’s untimely objection to distribution of “reemployment insurance benefits”).
Fish v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 748 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Fish v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 748 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“While this court is not bound by an agency’s conclusions of law, the manner in which an agency has construed a statute may be entitled to some weight when the statutory language is technical in nature and the agency’s interpretation is one of longstanding application.”
Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc. 721 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc. 721 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision, giving deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ, Jenson v. Dep’t of Econ.
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“The party seeking review on appeal has the burden of proving that the agency has exceeded its statutory authority or jurisdiction.” (citing Markwardt v. State, Water Res.
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Middle River-Snake River Watershed District v. Dennis Drewes, Inc. 692 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Middle River-Snake River Watershed District v. Dennis Drewes, Inc. 692 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Brown v. National American University 686 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Brown v. National American University 686 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Risk v. Eastside Beverage 664 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Risk v. Eastside Beverage 664 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Whether an employee’s acts constitute employment misconduct is a question of law on which a reviewing court remains “free to exercise its independent judgment.” (citation omitted).
Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695 649 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695 649 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Madsen v. Adam Corp. 647 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Settlement Capital Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 646 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Madsen v. Adam Corp. 647 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Settlement Capital Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 646 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc. 642 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc. 642 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See, (suggesting that where a statute is technical in nature, an agency’s longstanding interpretation of the statutory language may be entitled some interpretive weight).
Khawaja v. State Farm Insurance Companies 631 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Khawaja v. State Farm Insurance Companies 631 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Pinkerton 628 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Pinkerton 628 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Greenfield 622 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Greenfield 622 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Johnson v. Dolphin Staffing 614 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Johnson v. Dolphin Staffing 614 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re Conservatorship of Malecha 607 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re Conservatorship of Malecha 607 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
see also Van Den Boom, d at 354 (distinguishing between statutory eligibility for attorneys’ fees and reasonableness of attorneys’ fees award).
State v. Uber 604 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Uber 604 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Graham v. Itasca County Planning Commission 601 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1999