Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 568 N.W.2d 426.

113 citing documents.

State v. Swaney 787 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2010
In State v. Johnson we said that “[e]videntiary rulings generally rest within the district court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of that discretion.”
State v. Stockwell 770 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Stockwell 770 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
The Minnesota Supreme Court has observed that the jury “ ‘is free to accept part and reject part of a witness’ testimony.’ ” ().
State v. Mems 708 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 2006
State v. Mems 708 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 2006
State v. Palubicki 700 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2005
State v. Palubicki 700 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2005
Huff v. State 698 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2005
Huff v. State 698 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2005
(quoting State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449, 458 , ).
State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
State v. Johnson , , 434 (Minn. 1997).
State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
404(b); -34 (Minn.1997).
State v. Odell 676 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 2004
State v. Odell 676 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 2004
State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
David McCord, The Admissibility of Evidence Offered by a Criminal Defendant to Suggest That Someone Else is Guilty, 63 Tenn.
State v. Gutierrez 667 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2003
State v. Gutierrez 667 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2003
State v. McBride 666 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2003
State v. McBride 666 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2003
State v. Manley 664 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2003
State v. Manley 664 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2003
State v. Quick 659 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 2003
State v. Quick 659 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 2003
State v. Thao 649 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2002
State v. Kelbel 648 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 2002
State v. Thao 649 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2002
State v. Kelbel 648 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 2002
State v. Landa 642 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2002
State v. Landa 642 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2002
State v. Budreau 641 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 2002
State v. Budreau 641 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 2002
See, State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52
State v. Marchbanks 632 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Marchbanks 632 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Breaux 620 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Breaux 620 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Woodruff v. State 608 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 2000
Woodruff v. State 608 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 2000
State v. Denison 607 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Denison 607 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(defendant may seek to introduce evidence of other crimes or misconduct of a third person to prove that the third person, rather than defendant, committed the crime charged).
State v. Duncan 605 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Duncan 605 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Flores 595 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1999
State v. Flores 595 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1999
404(b); State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 495-97 , -73 (1965) (discussing admission of prior bad acts by the defendant that tend to prove the defendant committed the crime); (discussing the admission of “reveYse-Spreigl ” evidence).
State v. Williams 593 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1999