Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Souto, 578 N.W.2d 744.
- State v. Rochefort 631 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 2001
- State v. Hochstein 623 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Hochstein 623 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Rochefort 619 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Rochefort
619 N.W.2d 564
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(information in search warrant stale when “it had been over six months since [defendant’s] reported purchase of less than an ounce of methamphetamine and since the last reported drug party.
- State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Secord 614 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Secord
614 N.W.2d 227
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The court’s task on appeal is to “ensure that the issuing judge had a ‘substantial basis’ for concluding that probable cause existed.” (citation omitted).
- State v. Harris 589 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1999
- State v. Harris 589 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1999
- State v. Bynum 579 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Bynum 579 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1998