Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baker v. State, 590 N.W.2d 636.

33 citing documents.

State v. VONBEHREN 777 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. VONBEHREN 777 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Blooflat 671 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Blooflat 671 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
2(g) (Supp.1999), arguing that by mandating consecutive sentences for included offenses, the legislature has effectively re-created a
State v. Harris 667 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 2003
State v. Sanchez-Sanchez 654 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Sanchez-Sanchez 654 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(holding that prospective ruling .that statute defining offense violated right to twelve-person jury did not apply to defendants already tried who had not challenged the statute).
State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
Minnesota Equal Access Network Services v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Means v. BURLINGTON NO. & SANTA FE R. CO. 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Means v. BURLINGTON NO. & SANTA FE R. CO. 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Minnesota Equal Access Network Services v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Kortkamp 633 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Kortkamp 633 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(applying de novo review to issue of statutory construction).
Hince v. O'KEEFE 632 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2001
Hince v. O'KEEFE 632 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2001
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 632 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 632 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
State v. Schwartz 628 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2001
State v. Schwartz 628 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2001
State v. Tomlin 622 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2001
State v. Tomlin 622 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2001
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSG 622 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 2001
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSG 622 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 2001
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, Vin 2MEBP95F9CX644211 License No. MN 225 NSG 609 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, Vin 2MEBP95F9CX644211 License No. MN 225 NSG 609 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-40 (Minn.1999) (holding that any crime punishable by imprisonment of more than one year is a felony requiring a 12-person jury trial).
State v. Duncan 605 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Duncan 605 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Neely 604 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Neely 604 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Uber 604 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Uber 604 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
The three enhanced gross misdemeanor DWI charges were later dropped, that the gross misdemeanor statutes violate the state constitutional guarantee to a 12-person jury for crimes punishable by a sentence of more than one year.