Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of Ramsey, 609 N.W.2d 868.

39 citing documents.

Brenda Thormodson v. Kathryn Rae Zehnder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Brenda Thormodson v. Kathryn Rae Zehnder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
On summary judgment, a party “may not simply rest on [their] pleadings, but must produce affirmative evidence to show an issue of material fact.” Brookfield Trade Ctr.
Thomas Noree, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Noree “may not simply rest on [his] pleadings, but must produce affirmative evidence to show an issue of material fact.” Brookfield Trade Ctr., .
Kimberly Kay Mountjoy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Arch Insurance Company, as subrogee of Centre Rental, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Brookfield Trade Ctr., Inc. v. County of Ramsey , .
Michael Bartell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
subject to de novo review.” Brookfield Trade Ctr., Inc. v. County of Ramsey , ; see also SCI, d at 861 (noting that an appellate court “review[s] legal decisions on summary judgment under a de novo standard” and that this “standard of review does not change simply because the claims at issue are for equitable relief”).
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
n.6 (Minn. 2000) (“[p]artial summary judgments are interlocutory in nature, and as such are not final judgments,” so they generally are not appealable).
Paul Nelsen, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
P. 54.02; Brookfield Trade Ctr., Inc. v. C ounty of Ramsey , n.6 (Minn. 2000).
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
South Saint Paul v. Hetherington , 240 Minn. 298 , , 742 (1953) ; see also Brookfield Trade Ctr., Inc. v. County of Ramsey , , 876 (Minn. 2000) (stating that evidence is "viewed in the context of a presumption that the county assessor, as a government official, properly performed his official duties and complied with statutory procedures" in certifying minimum market value of property); R.E.
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC 837 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC 837 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
v. County of Ramsey, , 873 n. 6 (Minn.2000); see also Erickson v. General United Life Ins.
Harbaugh v. Commissioner of Revenue 830 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 2013
Harbaugh v. Commissioner of Revenue 830 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 2013
of Ramsey, , 874 n. 6 (Minn.2000); Tarutis v. Comm’r of Revenue
T & R Flooring, LLC v. O'Byrne 826 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
T & R Flooring, LLC v. O'Byrne 826 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
v. County of Ramsey, , 873 n. 6 (Minn.2000); see also Erickson v. General United Life Ins.
Beuning Family LP v. County of Stearns 817 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 2012
Beuning Family LP v. County of Stearns 817 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 2012
P. 103.03 as grounds for our jurisdiction in this case, the County relies on a footnote to our opinion in Brookfield Trade Center, , 873 n. 6 (Minn.2000).
Campos v. State 816 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 2012
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC 773 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2009
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC 773 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2009
2 See Brookfield Trade Ctr., , 873 n. 6 (Minn.2000); accord Liberty Mut.
Buscher v. MONTAG DEVELOPMENT, INC. 770 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Buscher v. MONTAG DEVELOPMENT, INC. 770 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Perry v. State 705 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2005
Perry v. State 705 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2005
see Brookfield Trade Ctr., , 873 n. 6 (Minn.2000) (noting that this court may address issues not otherwise ripe for appeal in the interest of justice and judicial economy).
Harris v. County of Hennepin 679 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2004
Harris v. County of Hennepin 679 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2004
Brookfield Trade Center, -74 (Minn.2000).
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
Gunderson v. Harrington 632 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
Gunderson v. Harrington 632 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
Lake Superior Paper Industries v. State 624 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 2001
Lake Superior Paper Industries v. State 624 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 2001
We recently addressed the issue of whether an assessor’s certification complied with the statute governing assessment agreement certification requirements in Brookfield Trade Ctr., (hereinafter Brookfield II).
Gunderson v. Harrington 619 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Gunderson v. Harrington 619 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
“The determination of whether a genuine issue of material fact exists is * ⅜ * subject to de novo review.”
Dealers Manufacturing, Co. v. County of Anoka 615 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 2000
Dealers Manufacturing, Co. v. County of Anoka 615 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 2000