Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Torres, 632 N.W.2d 609.
- State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Mayhorn
720 N.W.2d 776
Minn. 2006
(quoting Standards for Criminal Justice § 3 — 5.8(a) (1979)) (“It is unprofessional conduct for the prosecutor intentionally to misstate the evidence * * *.”).
- Torres v. State 688 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2004
- Torres v. State 688 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2004
- State v. Bolstad 686 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 2004
- State v. Bolstad 686 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 2004
- State v. Tate 682 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Tate 682 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
- State v. Dick 638 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
State v. Dick
638 N.W.2d 486
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
10 Minnesota Practice, CRIMJIG 7.03 (1999); (stating that “the possibility of intoxication does not create the presumption that a defendant is thereby rendered incapable of intending to do a certain act” (citation omitted)).