Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kaiser v. State, 641 N.W.2d 900.

108 citing documents.

Dikken v. State 896 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2017
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State v. Brown 896 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Brown 896 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Direct consequences are “definite, immediate[,] and automatic” and are “punitive and a part of a defendant’s sentence.”
Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota 887 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota 887 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
the State contends that Taylor has not shown that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.
State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Gary Lee Hanson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Conversely, “collateral consequences ‘are not punishment’ but are ‘civil and regulatory in nature and are imposed in the interest of public safety.’” (-07 (Minn. 2002)), review denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Gary Lee Hanson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“Public policy favors the finality of judgments 4 and courts are not disposed to encourage accused persons to play games with the courts by setting aside judgments of conviction based upon pleas made with deliberation and accepted by the court with
Desmon Demond Burks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Desmon Demond Burks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Larry Lee Hough Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Larry Lee Hough Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “[a] defendant need not be advised of every consequence for his plea to be intelligent.”
Theodore Lee Wicken v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Theodore Lee Wicken v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
It based its decision on State v. Kaiser, which held that “[t]he duty to register as a predatory offender is a regulatory rather than punitive consequence and therefore is a collateral consequence of appellant’s guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Chad Allan Mikiska Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Chad Allan Mikiska Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(finding that sexual- offender registration is an immediate, definite, and automatic consequence of a guilty plea).
Danny Lee Zinski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Lee Zinski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
2 (1994); (explaining that “notice [of the registration requirement] can be provided by an employee of the Department of Corrections, an executive branch agency, if the court fails to do so”).
Hector Martinez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hector Martinez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Steven Daniel Waldor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Steven Daniel Waldor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“‘Consequences’ refers to a plea’s direct consequences,” id., which are consequences that are, inter alia, “definite, immediate and automatic,”
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
5 Hodges argues that his “plea was not intelligent because he was misinformed about the guideline sentencing range for this offense.” “A defendant need not be advised of every consequence for his plea to be intelligent.” (emphasis omitted).
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rather, “[i]neligibility to possess a firearm is a collateral consequence of a conviction,” and “[g]enerally, collateral consequences ‘are not punishment’ but are ‘civil and regulatory in nature and are imposed in the interest of public safety,’” (– 07 (Minn. 2002)), review denied (Minn. May 21, 2013).
State v. Crump 826 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Crump 826 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Generally, collateral consequences “are not punishment” but are “civil and regulatory in nature and are imposed in the interest of public safety.” -07 (Minn.2002) (classifying sex-offender registration as collateral consequence); see also Sames, d at 569 (“[T]he risk of becoming ineligible to possess a firearm is a collateral consequence of a guilty plea.”); (classifying revocation of driving pr
Campos v. State 816 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 2012
Sames v. State 805 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Sames v. State 805 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Freeman v. State 804 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Freeman v. State 804 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Dahlin v. Kroening 784 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re the Risk Level Determination of G.G. 771 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Risk Level Determination of G.G. 771 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
has been described in consistent terms in caselaw, e.g., “to create an offender registry to assist law enforcement with investigations,” “to monitor sex offenders released into the community,” “to keep law *68 enforcement informed as to a predatory offender’s whereabouts,” and to provide “law-enforcement officials with the whereabouts of sexual offenders to assist them with investigations,” review denied (Minn. May 20, 1997).
Morgan v. 2000 Volkswagen, License No. 279, Vin 3VWRA29M2YM125643 754 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Morgan v. 2000 Volkswagen, License No. 279, Vin 3VWRA29M2YM125643 754 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Jedlicka 747 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Jedlicka 747 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
the court shall tell the person of the duty to register”); (noting that “notice [of registration requirement] can be provided by an employee of the Department of Corrections, an executive branch agency, if the court fails to do so”).
State v. Jones 729 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2007
State v. Jones 729 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2007
Specifically, we must address Jones’s mandate a conclusion that section 243.166is civil/regulatory in nature.
State v. Jones 700 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 2005