Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Neal v. State, 658 N.W.2d 536.
- State v. Houston 702 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 2005
- State v. Houston 702 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 2005
- State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
- State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
- State v. Rhoades 690 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Houston 689 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
State v. Houston
689 N.W.2d 556
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
and argues that, because Neal was unavailable at the time of his direct appeal, his claims bypass the Knaffla procedural bar.
- State v. Rhoades 690 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Fairbanks 688 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
State v. Fairbanks
688 N.W.2d 333
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
But we remanded to the district court for reconsideration of the 480-month sentence for kidnapping based on the Minnesota Supreme Court’s which cautioned against sentences approaching the statutory maximum absent severe aggravating circumstances.