Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Chapman v. Commissioner of Revenue, 651 N.W.2d 825.

44 citing documents.

Minn. 2021
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue, see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2020) (“The object of all interpretation and construction of laws is to ascertain and effectu ate the intention of the legislature.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Although we can strike a seve rable statutory provision if it is unconstitutional and void, “we cannot add language to a statute in order to render it constitutionally permissible.” Chapman v. Comm’ r of Revenue , (quotation omitted).
BFI Waste Sys. of N. Am., LLC v. Bishop 927 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
BFI Waste Sys. of N. Am., LLC v. Bishop 927 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Chapman v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 832 (Minn. 2002).
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC v. Comm'r of Revenue 916 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 2018
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC v. Comm'r of Revenue 916 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 2018
Chapman v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 830 (Minn. 2002).
Minn. Sands, LLC v. Cnty. of Winona 917 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Minn. Sands, LLC v. Cnty. of Winona 917 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Chapman v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 832 (Minn. 2002).
Fielding v. Comm'r of Revenue 916 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2018
Back v. State 902 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2017
Back v. State 902 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2017
ce, we do not excise just a word or a phrase from a provision if “the valid provisions [of the law] are so essentially and inseparably connected with, and so dependent upon, the void provisions that the Legislature would not have enacted the valid provisions without the voided language.” Melchert-Dinkel, d at 24 (internal quotation marks omitted); see, e.g., Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue, (severing the full provision, rather than a single word, because the court could not conclude that the Legisl
Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson 896 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson 896 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Although the Commerce Clause refers to an affirmative grant of power to Congress, it has long been interpreted to contain an implied negative command, called the Dormant Commerce Clause, that states may not unduly burden or discriminate against interstate commerce.” -(citing Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue, ).
A16-1504 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Although the Commerce Clause re fers to an affirmativ e grant of power to Congress, it has long been interpreted to contain an implied negative command, called the Dormant Commerce Clause, that states may not unduly burden or discriminate against interstate commerce.” Matter of Griepentrog , (citing Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue , (M inn.
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of Hennepin 886 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of Hennepin 886 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
“In construing the meaning and scope of a statute, the words of the statute govern and are given their common and approved usage.” Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Lori Swanson and its Commissioner of Commerce, Michael Rothman v. CashCall, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Lori Swanson and its Commissioner of Commerce, Michael Rothman v. CashCall, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Although the Commerce Clause represents an affirmative grant of power to Congress, it has long been held to impliedly contain a negative command, commonly referred to as the ‘Dormant’ Commerce Clause, that the states may not discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce.” Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
HMN Financial, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 782 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2010
HMN Financial, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 782 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2010
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
McLane Minnesota, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 773 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2009
McLane Minnesota, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 773 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2009
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Revenue 770 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 2009
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Revenue 770 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 2009
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
State v. Lushenko 714 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Lushenko 714 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
at 143 (quoting Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue, ); see also Henderson, d at 763 (stating that “[W]e declined to engraft onto the sentencing guidelines and sentencing statutes a requirement for sentencing juries or bifurcated trials, for to do so would require us to rewrite those guidelines and statutes.”) (emphasis added).
Deegan v. State 711 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2006
Deegan v. State 711 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2006
(citing Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue, ).
Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 698 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 2005
Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 698 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 2005
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 698 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2005
Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 698 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2005
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
Mbna America Bank, Na v. Com'r of Revenue 694 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 2005
Mbna America Bank, Na v. Com'r of Revenue 694 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 2005
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
Bond v. Commissioner of Revenue 691 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2005
Bond v. Commissioner of Revenue 691 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2005
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
State v. Kolla 672 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kolla 672 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
We first determine whether the challenged statute implicates the Commerce Clause and, if it does, then evaluate whether the statute violates the Commerce Clause.” Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue, (citation omitted).
Gaertner Ex Rel. Minnesota State Patrol v. One 1999 Dodge Pickup Truck, MN Lic. No. GKR-391 668 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Gaertner Ex Rel. Minnesota State Patrol v. One 1999 Dodge Pickup Truck, MN Lic. No. GKR-391 668 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue
State v. Koenig 666 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 2003
State v. Koenig 666 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 2003
§ 645.16 (2002); Chapman v. Comm’r of Revenue

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by