Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc., 663 N.W.2d 550.

162 citing documents.

Marchant Investment & Management Co. v. St. Anthony West Neighborhood Organization, Inc. 694 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marchant Investment & Management Co. v. St. Anthony West Neighborhood Organization, Inc. 694 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Midway Massage, Inc. 695 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Midway Massage, Inc. 695 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.
Newman v. Brendel & Zinn, Ltd. 691 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Newman v. Brendel & Zinn, Ltd. 691 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Dismissal under Rule 12 a. Standard of review When reviewing a dismissal under Rule 12.02(e) of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, this court determines de novo “whether the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 686 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2004
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 686 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2004
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2004
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2004
The general standard is that to survive a Rule 12 motion, a plaintiff need only set forth in the complaint “a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 670 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 670 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
When reviewing a dismissal pursuant to rule 12.02(e), an appellate court must determine “whether the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.