Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Foreman, 680 N.W.2d 536.

181 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Bruce Cournoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
And the supreme court has stated that “a conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.” d 536, 539 (Minn. 2004) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Charles Arthur Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Arthur Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[A] conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.” (quotation omitted); see also Minn. Stat. § 609.347, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Joeseph Norman Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joeseph Norman Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[A] conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of [even] a single credible witness.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Paul Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Paul Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ruben Alonso Avendano Contreras Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ruben Alonso Avendano Contreras Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[A] conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “a conviction can rest upon the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. John Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Antionee Jarmaine Mixon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antionee Jarmaine Mixon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kalen Duane Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kalen Duane Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
ly undermined by inconsistent testimony, the state failed to prove the assault charges beyond a reasonable doubt.” He asserts that “grave doubts about exactly what happened exist and the evidence at trial did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that [he] assaulted [J.M.N.]” “[A] conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
It is well established that “a conviction may be based on a single person’s testimony.” (“We have stated that a conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Corey Lee Melde Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Corey Lee Melde Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[A] conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Cao 788 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 2010
State v. Cao 788 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 2010
(“Eye witness testimony, standing alone, can support a guilty verdict.”); (“We have stated that ‘a conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.’ ”) (quoting State v. Hill, 285 Minn. 518, 518 , ).
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Lussier 695 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Lussier 695 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2005

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by