Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, 343 N.W.2d 843.
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Petition of Northern States Power Co. 416 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1987
- Petition of Northern States Power Co. 416 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1987
- Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- In re Summary Investigation into Intrastate Switched Access Charges Proposed by Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. for its Minnesota … 402 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State ex rel. Johnson v. City of Duluth 402 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- In re Summary Investigation into Intrastate Switched Access Charges Proposed by Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. for its Minnesota … 402 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State ex rel. Johnson v. City of Duluth
402 N.W.2d 579
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Factual findings made by an agency in a quasi-judicial context, such as this, will be upheld if they are supported by “substantial evidence.”
- Big Fish Lake Sportsmen's Club, Inc. v. State, Water Resources Board 400 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Big Fish Lake Sportsmen's Club, Inc. v. State, Water Resources Board 400 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Petition of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Petition of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Petition of American Freight Systems, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Petition of American Freight Systems, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Burnett v. Stearns County Welfare Board 370 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Burnett v. Stearns County Welfare Board 370 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Draganosky v. Minnesota Board of Psychology 367 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1985
-
Draganosky v. Minnesota Board of Psychology
367 N.W.2d 521
Minn. 1985
See City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Comm’n, (agency decisions come to this court with the presumption of regularity and the burden is on person challenging agency action to prove that its decision was improper).
- Petition of Inter-City Gas Corp. 358 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Petition of Inter-City Gas Corp. 358 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Brinks, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 355 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Brinks, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
355 N.W.2d 446
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Our courts have “consistently stressed the importance of agencies employing their expertise to reach independent decisions and not to simply ‘rubber stamp’ the findings of a hearing examiner.”
- Beaty v. Minnesota Board of Teaching 354 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Beaty v. Minnesota Board of Teaching
354 N.W.2d 466
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Although agencies are not bound by a hearing examiner’s findings, the hearing examiner’s findings should not be taken lightly.