Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, 343 N.W.2d 843.

75 citing documents.

Moline Machinery, LLC, et al., Appellants, vs. City of Duluth, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Moline Machinery, LLC, et al., Appellants, vs. City of Duluth, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Comm’n, see also In re Application by Minn. Power for Auth.
Jeremy McNitt, Relator v. Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jeremy McNitt, Relator v. Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re City of Cohasset’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Frontier … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Comm’n, Hazelton v. Comm’r of Dep’t of Hum.
Patti Amanda’s Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Comm’n , (discussing deference granted to the Minn esota Public Utilities Commission when acting in a legislative capacity).
Park Estates, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Comm’n , (discussing judicial review of MPUC utility ratemaking).
In the Matter of the Denial of Rental Dwelling Licenses to Compass Rose Real Estate, LLC, and North … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Denial of Rental Dwelling Licenses to Compass Rose Real Estate, LLC, and North … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Comm’n, d 843, 846 (Minn. 1984)).
In the Matter of Franz Schauer, WCA Application, dated April 28, 2014 for No-Loss and Exemption Petition for … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of Franz Schauer, WCA Application, dated April 28, 2014 for No-Loss and Exemption Petition for … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Comm’n, (stating that an appellate court will not disturb an agency’s decision if it is supported by the record).
In the Matter of the Appeals of Kevin D. Moser, for MSRS Correctional Plan Service. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Appeals of Kevin D. Moser, for MSRS Correctional Plan Service. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes 823 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 2012
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes 823 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 2012
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Enlargement of the Valley Branch Watershed District 781 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Enlargement of the Valley Branch Watershed District 781 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Comrn’n, (stating burden of proof); CUP Foods, (stating presumption), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T 759 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T 759 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Comm’n, (quotation and citation omitted).
In Re Universal Underwriters Life Insurance Co. 685 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Universal Underwriters Life Insurance Co. 685 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Comm’n, ("We have consistently stressed the importance of agencies employing their expertise to reach independent decisions and not to simply 'rubber stamp' the findings of a hearing examiner.”).
In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality Standards 678 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality Standards 678 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of … 664 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of … 664 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2003
Comm’n, (quoting Hymanson v. City of St.
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
Comm’n, and his final decision must be supported by substantial evidence which we have defined in part as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Cable Communications Bd.
In Re Medical License of Friedenson 574 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re Medical License of Friedenson 574 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Application of Q Petroleum 498 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Application of Q Petroleum 498 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Dougherty 482 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Dougherty 482 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In re Wilson 466 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In re Wilson 466 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
While the courts have indicated that a board should not merely “rubber stamp” the findings of a hearing examiner, City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Comm’n, nevertheless, the board should not take the ALJ’s findings lightly: A hearing examiner’s report and recommendations should not be summarily rejected without reasons.
In Re the Proposed Immediate Discharge of Etienne 460 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Proposed Immediate Discharge of Etienne 460 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Real Estate Salesperson's License of Perron 437 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Real Estate Salesperson's License of Perron 437 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Department of Human Services v. Muriel Humphrey Residences 436 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Department of Human Services v. Muriel Humphrey Residences 436 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
M.T. Properties, Inc. v. Alexander 433 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
M.T. Properties, Inc. v. Alexander 433 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1987

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by