Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co., 366 N.W.2d 271.

225 citing documents.

Industrial Steel Container Co. Ex Rel. Rutman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 399 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Industrial Steel Container Co. Ex Rel. Rutman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 399 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gunderson v. Classified Insurance Corp. 397 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gunderson v. Classified Insurance Corp. 397 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
should be applied to extend coverage in this case, even if the insurance provisions at issue are clear and unambiguous.
Johnson v. Urie 394 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Johnson v. Urie 394 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Louwagie v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 397 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Park v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 396 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Park v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 396 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Keeton, Insurance Law Rights at Variance with Policy Pro *903 visions, 83 Harv.L.Rev.
Louwagie v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 397 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Curtis v. Home Insurance Co. 392 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Curtis v. Home Insurance Co. 392 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Merseth v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 390 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Merseth v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 390 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the court considered a burglary insurance policy which contained an “evidence of forcible entry” requirement in its definition of burglary.
Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1986
Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1986
see also Keeton, Insurance Law Rights at Variance with Policy Provisions, 83 Harv.
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ziebarth 386 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1986
Kanter v. Metropolitan Medical Center 384 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kanter v. Metropolitan Medical Center 384 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Arndt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 380 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Arndt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 380 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the leading Minnesota case addressing the reasonable expectations doctrine, the supreme court found coverage under a burglary insurance policy based upon the reasonable expectations of the purchaser of the policy.
Austin P. Keller Construction Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 379 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1986
Austin P. Keller Construction Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 379 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1986
Schmidt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 376 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Schmidt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 376 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1985