Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hanson v. State, 344 N.W.2d 420.
- State v. Ward 580 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Ward
580 N.W.2d 67
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The affidavit must contain “ ‘sufficient underlying facts so that the magistrate may draw his own conclusions of whether probable cause exists.’ ” (quoting Minnesota Judge’s Criminal Benehbook, 1-4 (1983 Supp.)).
- State v. McCloskey 451 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. McCloskey
451 N.W.2d 225
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
' the supreme court in Gates emphasized that the basis for the informant’s knowledge, reliability and ve *228 racity are closely intertwined issues which may be considered in determining whether there is probable cause to support a search warrant.
- State v. Skinner 450 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Skinner 450 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. DeZeler 422 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. DeZeler 422 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Duea 414 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Duea
414 N.W.2d 513
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Bagley, 286 Minn. 180, 188 , (Minn.Ct.App.
- Potter v. State 410 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Potter v. State 410 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hernandez v. State 408 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hernandez v. State 408 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Lallier v. State 403 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Lallier v. State 403 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Harris v. State 399 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Harris v. State
399 N.W.2d 690
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
d *694 702, 707 (Minn.1979) (evidence of prior convictions may have impeachment value if it aids the jury in determining the witness’ credibility); (the trial court’s cautionary instructions limited any prejudicial effect resulting from the introduction of prior conviction evidence).
- Wanglie v. State 398 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Wanglie v. State 398 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marshall v. State 395 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marshall v. State 395 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Brodell v. State 393 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Brodell v. State 393 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Rupp 393 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Rupp
393 N.W.2d 496
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
see also State v. Armstrong, 257 Minn. 295, 308-09 , -08 (1960).
- Herme v. State 384 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Herme v. State 384 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Lopez 379 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Lopez 379 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Garritsen 371 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Garritsen 371 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Hagen 361 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Hagen 361 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Hanson 355 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Hanson
355 N.W.2d 328
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
at 2332 (emphasis added)
- State v. Jannetta 355 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Jannetta
355 N.W.2d 189
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
- In re the Welfare of A.J.M. 354 N.W.2d 123 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
In re the Welfare of A.J.M.
354 N.W.2d 123
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
say how he and a friend entered a : The standard for probable cause stated by the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. Gates, [462] U.S. [213], 103 S.Ct.
- State v. Wiley 348 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Wiley 348 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Doughman v. State 351 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Doughman v. State 351 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Hanson v. State 345 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Hanson v. State
345 N.W.2d 794
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The specific issue of the validity of the August 8, 1981