Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pietila v. Congdon, 362 N.W.2d 328.

31 citing documents.

Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Dissenting as to Part I, Anderson, J., David Smits, as Trustee for the … Minn. 2022
d 666, 673 n.4 (Minn. 2001) (noting that “crime prevention is essentially a government function, not a private duty”); (holding that a landowner owed no duty to a person murdered by a third party because there was no way for the landowner to know ahead of time whether security measures were adequate).
Minn. 2021
See, e.g., Pietila v. Congdon , (noting that even assuming defendants owed a duty of care to plaintiff and breached that duty, plaintiff still had to prove separately that the breach proximately caused the deaths at issue).
Temitope Raufu Ibraheem v. Epic Entertainment, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Temitope Raufu Ibraheem v. Epic Entertainment, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
-10 (Minn.1996) (holding that a special relationship did not exist between the manager of a mobile home park and the resident children and that therefore the manager did not have a duty to take action to protect the children after they reported being sexually abused by another resident); (reversing jury verdict against trustees of mansion in wrongful death action and stating “we know of no case which imposes upon a homeowner the duty to protect persons invited to his residential premises from th
Olmanson v. LeSueur County 693 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 2005
Olmanson v. LeSueur County 693 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 2005
-33 (Minn.1985); Peterson v. Balach, 294 Minn. 161, 174
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bigos v. Kluender 611 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bigos v. Kluender 611 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The cases relied on by the Kluen-ders are readily distinguishable by the fact that they involved the landlord’s duty to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises in such a manner that “does not expose the visitor to an unreasonable risk of harm.” -33 (Minn.1985).
Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Duluth 526 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Duluth 526 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Errico v. Southland Corp. 509 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Errico v. Southland Corp. 509 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-33 (Minn.1985) (criminal acts of unknown third persons are not activity of owner and do not constitute condition of land).
Rasivong v. Lakewood Community College 504 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rasivong v. Lakewood Community College 504 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Spitzak v. Hylands, Ltd. 500 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Spitzak v. Hylands, Ltd. 500 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
("A criminal act such as murder or armed robbery committed by a person or persons unknown is not an activity of the owner and does not constitute a condition of the land.”) 3 .
Otto v. City of St. Paul 460 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Otto v. City of St. Paul 460 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co. 447 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1989
Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co. 447 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1989
Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co. 432 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co. 432 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
contending that foreseeability is lacking.
Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The problems inherent in the imposition of a
Larson v. Larson 373 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1985
Larson v. Larson 373 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1985
Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R.