Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Zobel & Dahl Construction v. Crotty, 356 N.W.2d 42.

31 citing documents.

All Around Property Preservation, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
All Around Property Preservation, LLC v. Ronald Clark, Bank of America, N.A., ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
All Around Property Preservation, LLC v. Ronald Clark, Bank of America, N.A., ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The Clarks contend that the district court erred in its determination that their “refusal to allow [AAPP] and SHC to cure the vapor barrier issues with patch-tape was unreasonable and excused [AAPP’s] and SHC’s performance.” “Generally, contract performance is excused when it is hindered or rendered impossible by the other party.” Zobel &
City of Long Lake, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
David Schindele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Crotty, (“Generally, contract performance is excused when it is hindered or rendered impossible by the other party.”).
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Central Specialties, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Central Specialties, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Crotty, see also Haase v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 205 (1981).
Smart Construction & Remodeling, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Timothy Aadland, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Crotty, such as by a “previous ‘uncured material failure’ by the other party,” Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd., (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 237 (1981)), or “a repudiating party[’s] .
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Michael Hudson v. Daniel Joseph Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Michael Hudson v. Daniel Joseph Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Crotty, (“Generally, contract performance is excused when it is hindered or rendered impossible by the other party.”).
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Opheim v. County of Norman 784 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Opheim v. County of Norman 784 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
v. Crotty, (stating that an appellate court does not render advisory opinions).
Derosier v. Utility Systems of America, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Derosier v. Utility Systems of America, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
v. Crotty, (finding no error in jury instruction stating contractor had right to enter premises and cure defects if he had substantially completed project and received notice of defect); Bruner & O’Connor on Construction Law §§ 18:41, 19:21 (recognizing common-law implied right to cure).
Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 764 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2009
Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd. 552 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd. 552 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 540 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1995
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 540 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1995
v. Crotty, see also Haase v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., 257 Minn. 7, 13 , Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 205 (1981).
Nimis v. St. Paul Turners 521 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Nimis v. St. Paul Turners 521 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Blaine Economic Development Authority v. Royal Electric Co. 520 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Blaine Economic Development Authority v. Royal Electric Co. 520 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
v. Crotty, (where evidence reasonably tending to prove the existence of a fact issue exists, the trial court may submit it to the jury).