Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pearson v. Pearson, 363 N.W.2d 337.

35 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The party seeking the non-marital classification must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the asset was acquired in exchange for non-marital property.” Pearson v. Pearson , (quota tion omitted).
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
See, -5 (Minn.App.1986) (characterizing rental income available from nonmarital apartment building as marital income); (characterizing rental income received annually from nonmarital farm land as marital property).
Marriage of White v. White 521 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of White v. White 521 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
for rev. denied (Minn. May 22, 1986) (characterizing interest earned on non-marital property in a joint account as marital, but interest earned on a separate, untouched account remains nonmarital); (characterizing rental income received annually from nonmarital farm land as marital property).
Marriage of Wiegers v. Wiegers 467 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Swick v. Swick 467 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Swick v. Swick 467 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
d at 193-94 (cash dividends from stock); (interest earned from nonmarital certificates of deposit); (interest earned from stock debentures); Rosenberg, d at 583 (stock proceeds); -77 (Minn.App.1985) (rental income); (farm rental income).
Marriage of Wiegers v. Wiegers 467 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“The party seeking the nonmarital classification must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the asset was ‘acquired in exchange for nonmarital property.’” (citation omitted).
Marriage of Burns v. Burns 466 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Burns v. Burns 466 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Maher v. Maher 393 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Maher v. Maher 393 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Poach v. Poach 392 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Poach v. Poach 392 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
However, she claims that the acquisition of additional buildings and machinery during marriage is analogous to “improvements,” not to “appreciation” and is, thus
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Moore v. Moore 391 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Moore v. Moore 391 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
19, 1986) (proceeds from sale of stock not attributable to appreciation); (farm land rental income); (farm land rental income).
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 388 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 388 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Campion, d at 5 (apartment building rentals); Rosenberg, d at 583 (the recognized part of stock value attributed to earnings of the stockholder); (applying the rule to farm land rentals); -77 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) (farm land rentals).
Marriage of Campion v. Campion 385 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Campion v. Campion 385 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Rosenberg v. Rosenberg 379 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rosenberg v. Rosenberg 379 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Respondent says nothing to dispute a view of the 25% part of the investment as akin to income on nonmarital property
Marriage of Cummings v. Cummings 376 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Cummings v. Cummings 376 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Linderman v. Linderman 364 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Linderman v. Linderman 364 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1985