Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis, 367 N.W.2d 633.

45 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Lynn J. Dreger, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 258, 260-61 (Minn. App. 1995); 6 review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Elaine Radziwill v. Michael Radziwill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Elaine Radziwill v. Michael Radziwill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
5 d 633, 637 (Minn. App. 1984), review denied (Minn. Dec.
Schisel v. Schisel 762 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Schisel v. Schisel 762 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Kammueller v. Kammueller 672 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Kammueller v. Kammueller 672 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. June 30, 1986)
Marriage of Schlichting v. Paulus 632 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Schlichting v. Paulus 632 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-63 (Minn.App.1986), review denied (Minn. June 30, 1986); (stating that, in a joint physical-custody situation, each party’s support obligation is determined by the statutory guidelines during the time the other parent has custody).
Marriage of Davis v. Davis 631 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Davis v. Davis 631 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Rogers v. Rogers 622 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2001
Marriage of Rogers v. Rogers 622 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2001
See, (“Although both parents owe an equal duty of support, historically the assumption has been that the custodial parent provides his or her share of the support, whether through services or through expenditures not monitored by the court.
Marriage of Blonigen v. Blonigen 621 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Blonigen v. Blonigen 621 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“The court then applies an offset so that the net paid by the parent with the higher earnings is the difference between the reduced guidelines amounts.” Tweeton, d at 748 ( (offsetting the smaller obligation of one parent against larger obligation of other parent)).
Marriage of Rumney v. Rumney 611 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Rumney v. Rumney 611 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Ver Kuilen v. Ver Kuilen 578 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Ver Kuilen v. Ver Kuilen 578 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied (Minn. June 30,1986); -36 (Minn.App.1985).
Marriage of Tweeton v. Tweeton 560 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Marriage of Tweeton v. Tweeton 560 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
review denied (Minn. June 30, 1986); see also Broas, d at 673-74 (applying the Hortis/Valento formula in a joint custody situation); (stating that a calculation of support consistent with the formula described in Hor-tis is appropriate in a 50-50 split of custody).
In Re the Welfare of C.M.G. 516 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Welfare of C.M.G. 516 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Where the court orders joint physical custody, -36 (Minn.App.1985), -63 (Minn.App.1986), pet.
Marriage of Broas v. Broas 472 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Broas v. Broas 472 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
for rev. denied (Minn. June 30, 1986)
Marriage of Pavlasek v. Pavlasek 415 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Pavlasek v. Pavlasek 415 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Veit v. Veit 413 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Veit v. Veit 413 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
for rev. denied (Minn. June 30, 1986) ().
Marriage of Lujan v. Lujan 400 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lujan v. Lujan 400 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-11 (Minn.Ct.App.1985); -36 (Minn.Ct.App.1985)
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 395 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 395 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the trial court, in valuing a savings account consisting of marital property, disregarded recent expenditures for legal expenses from the account by the party receiving the account.
Marriage of Currey v. Currey 393 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Currey v. Currey 393 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Keithahn v. Keithahn 392 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Keithahn v. Keithahn 392 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“The general rule is that a party cannot be permitted to benefit by depletion before trial of marital assets within his control.”
Marriage of Valento v. Valento 385 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Valento v. Valento 385 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 382 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 382 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 378 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 378 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1985