Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johns v. Johns, 354 N.W.2d 564.

43 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Brown, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Jonathon Henry Ortner, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 564, 566 (Minn. App. 1984) (“A [district] court’s division of marital property need not be mathematically equal.”).
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Ann Fonoti, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A [district] court’s division of marital property need not be mathematically equal.”
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Johns v. 5 Johns, (“A trial court’s division of marital property need not be mathematically equal.”).
Marriage of Mancuso v. Mancuso 417 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Mancuso v. Mancuso 417 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
However, “[a] trial court’s division of marital property need not be mathematically equal [but] the court must make a just and equitable division of the marital property of the parties.” (); Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Southwell v. Southwell 413 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Southwell v. Southwell 413 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Preliminary Property Distribution “A trial court’s division of marital property need not be mathematically equal.”
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Spooner v. Spooner 410 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Spooner v. Spooner 410 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 408 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 408 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
A mathematically equal division of property is not mandated, particularly where Roger has substantial assets and income from his law practice, while Barbara has a high school education and minimal assets.
Marriage of Varner v. Varner 400 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Varner v. Varner 400 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 399 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 399 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Crace v. Crace 396 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Crace v. Crace 396 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“Trial courts are accorded broad discretion in the valuation and distribution of marital assets.”
Marriage of Currey v. Currey 393 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Currey v. Currey 393 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Jungbauer v. Jungbauer 391 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Jungbauer v. Jungbauer 391 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Vinnes v. Vinnes 384 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Vinnes v. Vinnes 384 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Watson v. Watson 379 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Watson v. Watson 379 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tailor-Navsaria v. Tailor-Navsaria 374 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The division need not be mathematically equal, *828 and the court has discretion to award debts to one party only.
Marriage of Tailor-Navsaria v. Tailor-Navsaria 374 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Wehner v. Wehner 374 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Wehner v. Wehner 374 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
However, “[t]o leave the wife with nothing because the marriage ended after several economic bad years would be questionable.”
Marriage of Otte v. Otte 368 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Otte v. Otte 368 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
A trial court has broad discretion to make property division awards, however, a trial court’s decision must be supported “by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the court.”
Marriage of Guetzkow v. Guetzkow 358 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Guetzkow v. Guetzkow 358 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1984