Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Herem, 384 N.W.2d 880.

69 citing documents.

State v. Martinson 422 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
However, , 884 n. 2 (Minn.1986).
State v. Forcier 420 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1988
State v. Forcier 420 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1988
See, *887 (stating that “not all errors in admitting illegally obtained confessions or statements justify overturning a conviction and granting a new trial” and holding that the record provided by the defendant on appeal did not establish that any error was prejudicial)
State v. Spencer 414 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Spencer 414 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. England 409 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. England 409 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See State v. Martin, 297 Minn. 470, 472-73
Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Clepper 399 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Clepper 399 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984)
State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
see Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
*688 3138, 3148-52, 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984) (driver’s admission that he had been drinking held admissible when made during a roadside interview pursuant to a routine traffic stop, even though Miranda warnings had not yet been given)
State v. Seekon 392 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Seekon 392 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
a Minnesota Supreme Court opinion released after the trial court’s decision in this matter, a traffic stop was effected after a high speed chase.
In re the Welfare of M.S.E. 389 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re the Welfare of M.S.E. 389 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1986