Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co., 389 N.W.2d 903.

34 citing documents.

A24-1454 A24-1455 A24-1700 A24-1741 A24-1750 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota 838 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 2013
In re Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota 838 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 2013
3 (1984), does permit departure from the statutory formula when there are exigent circumstances.”
In re Minnesota Power 807 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re Minnesota Power 807 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
The interim-rate statute does not define exigent circumstances, and the Minnesota caselaw has characterized it only generally, stating that “the term ‘exigent’ bespeaks urgency or emergency.”
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
(explaining that the interim rate procedure was intended to reduce fluctuations and the necessity for refunds, which were sometimes delayed); -09 (Minn.1986) (“Peoples Natural Gas II ”); Peoples Natural Gas, d at 535 (noting concern for stability in the ratemaking process).
Petition of Minnesota Power 545 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Petition of Minnesota Power 545 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
5; -09 (Minn.1986)(approving calculation of interim refunds according to prior rate design, rather than according to finally-approved rate design).
Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Juster Bros. v. Christgau, 214 Minn. 108, 119 , (due process requires adequate notice and a fair hearing); (refusal to conduct hearing not a denial of due process), aff'd
Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Juster Bros. v. Christgau, 214 Minn. 108, 119 , (due process requires adequate notice and a fair hearing); (refusal to conduct hearing not a denial of due process), aff'd
Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services 529 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services 529 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
at 43-44 (citations omitted) ().
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Good Neighbor Care Centers, -3 (Minn.App.1988) (), pet.
Wangen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Wangen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-90 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), affirmed, G. Beck, L. Bakken & T. Muck, Minnesota Administrative Procedure § 11.1 at 231 (1987).
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Respondent cites for the proposition that the improper promulgation of a rule does not render a correct interpretation of that rule incorrect.
Good Neighbor Care Centers, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 428 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Good Neighbor Care Centers, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 428 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co.
In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal Facility 421 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal Facility 421 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(“that MPUC may have articulated its construction of a statute in a rule improperly promulgated does not render a correct interpretation incorrect”).
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co. 413 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co. 413 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hernandez 395 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re Inter-City Gas Corp. 391 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re Inter-City Gas Corp. 391 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ANALYSIS In the supreme court held: [T]he only way the present statutory plan of utility rate regulation can be carried out consistently is to allocate interim rate increases among the consumer classes in accordance with the existing rate design, * * 4 and to distribute any refunds due because revenues collectible un
In Re Continental Telephone Co. of Minnesota 389 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1986
Petition of Inter-City Gas Corp. 389 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1986
Petition of Inter-City Gas Corp. 389 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1986
In Re Continental Telephone Co. of Minnesota 389 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1986
(filed herewith); (filed herewith).